2008
DOI: 10.1643/cg-06-039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Quantitative Method for Sex Identification in Emydid Turtles Using Secondary Sexual Characters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Box turtles were collected by hand, while sliders were collected via baited hoopnet traps in freshwater ponds on the University of South Alabama campus (Mobile, AL). Carapace length and width of each individual were measured using calipers and sex was recorded based on plastron morphology for box turtles (St Clair 1998) and body size, front claw length, and tail length and thickness for sliders (Readel et al 2008). Additionally, one common snapping turtle ( Chelydra serpentina ) was sampled for the initial protocol-testing phase of the project.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Box turtles were collected by hand, while sliders were collected via baited hoopnet traps in freshwater ponds on the University of South Alabama campus (Mobile, AL). Carapace length and width of each individual were measured using calipers and sex was recorded based on plastron morphology for box turtles (St Clair 1998) and body size, front claw length, and tail length and thickness for sliders (Readel et al 2008). Additionally, one common snapping turtle ( Chelydra serpentina ) was sampled for the initial protocol-testing phase of the project.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment of population demographics, including having accurate numbers of males and females, is vital for proper determination of population status and management techniques (Folt et al 2016, Readel et al 2008). Due to extensive and unsustainable harvest, populations of Alligator Snapping Turtles experienced significant declines up to the 1980s (Pritchard 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turtle tails exhibit morphological differences between the sexes that are relevant for mating, such as contrasting size, texture, or the relative position of the cloaca (JF & R 1980). For instance, tails are sexually dimorphic in Trachemys scripta turtles, a emydid close relative of C. picta, (ERNST 1971;Readel et al 2008), yet we did not observe sexually dimorphic DNA methylation in the hatchling tails, perhaps because the tail dimorphism…”
Section: Contrasting Patterns Of Dna Methylation Between Somatic and ...mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…has not yet developed in painted turtle hatchlings (Readel et al 2008) or because its development is not controlled epigenetically via DNA methylation. Further, the painted turtle does not rely on male combat or forced insemination, two mating strategies linked to male-specific body size and shape (ERNST 1971;JF & R 1980).…”
Section: Contrasting Patterns Of Dna Methylation Between Somatic and ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation