2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quantitative comparison of physiologic indicators of cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: Diastolic blood pressure versus end-tidal carbon dioxide

Abstract: Aim The American Heart Association (AHA) recommends monitoring invasive arterial diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) when available. In intensive care unit patients, both may be available to the rescuer. The objective of this study was to compare DBP versus ETCO2 during CPR as predictors of cardiac arrest survival. Methods In two models of cardiac arrest (primary ventricular fibrillation [VF] and asphyxia-associated VF), 3-month old s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(57 reference statements)
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…32 Some studies have suggested that optimizing CPR to achieve specific physiologic endpoints such as diastolic blood pressure, end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2), or cerebral oximetry may be beneficial. [33][34][35] These studies highlight a key knowledge gap-identifying the best target(s) for optimizing CPR performance.…”
Section: [H2]cpr Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 Some studies have suggested that optimizing CPR to achieve specific physiologic endpoints such as diastolic blood pressure, end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2), or cerebral oximetry may be beneficial. [33][34][35] These studies highlight a key knowledge gap-identifying the best target(s) for optimizing CPR performance.…”
Section: [H2]cpr Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results indicate that attempting to raise ETCO 2 levels during CPR can result in increased ETCO 2 levels that do not indicate likelihood of ROSC. Figure 3B1 shows that the relationship between the relaxation arterial pressure (a surrogate for myocardial perfusion (10, 3032)) and survival is present in both study groups during BLS. In contrast, the ETCO 2 , SPP, and CPP levels during BLS in the non-survivors of the ETCO 2 -guided group overlap the survivors of both groups (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Extracorporeal CPR (eCPR) technology is improving, but rates of neurologic injury and failure to wean from support after recovery remain high. Hemodynamic-directed CPR has shown great promise for improving survival and neurologic outcome in preclinical models when an arterial line is present to guide epinephrine administration (810, 32). Near-infrared spectroscopy measurements and amplitude analysis of ventricular fibrillation are other physiologic responses that have the potential to guide resuscitation efforts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CoPP, the difference between the aortic pressure and right atrial pressure during the relaxation phase of chest compressions (“diastole”) is the driving force for myocardial blood flow. 38,42 Higher levels of CoPP during CPR are associated with higher rates of ROSC and meaningful survival outcomes in both large animal investigations 15-17,19,38,43 and clinical studies. 44 CoPP values in this study were higher in animals treated with HD-CPR when analyzed continuously throughout CPR (Figure 3) and at a point in time just prior to the first defibrillation attempt (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%