2018
DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2018.11.09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quantitative comparison of five optical coherence tomography angiography systems in clinical performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the different evaluation approaches used in these studies and in the present study (especially the thresholding methods and the evaluated regions) make it almost impossible to conduct comparisons among various studies, although these aforementioned studies reported that these devices showed good or even excellent repeatability. Additionally, a few previous studies had demonstrated that the quantitative measurements were not directly interchangeable among different OCT-A systems [24]. However, only few studies compared their repeatability on the same cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, the different evaluation approaches used in these studies and in the present study (especially the thresholding methods and the evaluated regions) make it almost impossible to conduct comparisons among various studies, although these aforementioned studies reported that these devices showed good or even excellent repeatability. Additionally, a few previous studies had demonstrated that the quantitative measurements were not directly interchangeable among different OCT-A systems [24]. However, only few studies compared their repeatability on the same cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With OCT-A quantification becoming increasingly common, there is a pressing need to understand whether OCT-A systems can provide reliable and stable quantitative results and to determine which OCT-A system has better repeatability when using a specific scan pattern in clinical practice. Several studies have evaluated the reproducibility of various OCT-A systems; the results of these studies indicate that the outcomes of these instruments are generally uninterchangeable [24]. Therefore, the repeatability of one OCT-A system should be taken into consideration when that OCT-A system is used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The axial resolution is 5 µm, the lateral resolution is 15 µm and the imaging depth is 2–3 mm. 32 Examination of NVDs was performed using 3 x 3 and 4.5 x 4.5 mm volume protocols in Angio Disc mode. Evaluation of NVEs was performed in Angio Retina mode using 3 x 3 mm, 6 x 6 mm or 8 x 8 mm scans, with the larger scans used for the larger complexes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resolution is identical to the Avanti RTVue XR OCT and the imaging depth is 2 mm. 32 NVDs were imaged using 3 x 3 mm scan areas and NVEs using 3 x 3 mm, 6 x 6 mm or 8 x 8 mm scans. Scans with a quality of at least 6/10 were included.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several different approaches were used to analyze the decorrelation between repeated B-scans, using various components of the complex OCT signal [70][71][72], with distinct advantages and disadvantages in each of these approaches. Different vendors have also used different methods for calculating and displaying the OCT angiogram and thus comparability between different machines is not possible [73]. (E) The image of the deep plexus was segmented from the IPL to the outer plexiform layer (OPL).…”
Section: Principle Of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiographymentioning
confidence: 99%