2016
DOI: 10.3989/scimar.04307.23a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quantitative assessment of the cryptobenthic fish assemblage at deep littoral cliffs in the Mediterranean

Abstract: Summary:The present study provides the first quantitative assessment of cryptobenthic fish species diversity and abundance on hard bottoms below 20 m depth by examining Mediterranean underwater reefs with deep vertical cliffs. Quantitative sampling was performed at depths down to about 45 m and yielded 220 cryptobenthic and 61 epibenthic individuals belonging to 21 species, showing that the cryptobenthic fishes highly outnumbered the epibenthic individuals. The study highlights the high diversity and abundance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
8
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
8
2
Order By: Relevance
“…C. liechtensteini, M. macrocepha-lus, Z. zebrus and C. zebratus, had exclusively or predominantly cryptobenthic specimens, with no evidence for regular or significant habitat switches between cryptobenthic and epibenthic layers (Table 1). Similar to the findings of comparable studies, more than half the specimens sampled in our study belonged to the three most frequent species, all three gobies (Gobiidae) of minute size (Kovačić et al 2012, Glavičić et al 2016, Goatley et al 2016). Among those five most frequent species, C. liechtensteini, Z. zebrus and Chromogobius zebratus were confirmed to be cryptobenthic and abundant, as found by Kovačić et al (2012) and Glavičić et al (2016), whereas M. macrocephalus was absent or poorly represented in earlier studies due to the deeper depth ranges targeted by Kovačić et al (2012) and Glavičić et al (2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…C. liechtensteini, M. macrocepha-lus, Z. zebrus and C. zebratus, had exclusively or predominantly cryptobenthic specimens, with no evidence for regular or significant habitat switches between cryptobenthic and epibenthic layers (Table 1). Similar to the findings of comparable studies, more than half the specimens sampled in our study belonged to the three most frequent species, all three gobies (Gobiidae) of minute size (Kovačić et al 2012, Glavičić et al 2016, Goatley et al 2016). Among those five most frequent species, C. liechtensteini, Z. zebrus and Chromogobius zebratus were confirmed to be cryptobenthic and abundant, as found by Kovačić et al (2012) and Glavičić et al (2016), whereas M. macrocephalus was absent or poorly represented in earlier studies due to the deeper depth ranges targeted by Kovačić et al (2012) and Glavičić et al (2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Considering the lack of any data on diel variations in cryptobenthic fish assemblages and the rarity of studies on diel shifts of other littoral benthic fishes in general, the general goal of the present study was to fill this knowledge gap, which might hide important aspects of the dynamics and relationships of coastal inshore fish assemblages. The quantitative assessment of littoral cryptobenthic fish assemblages of the shallow infralittoral (0.5-3 m depth) also complements earlier studies of littoral cryptobenthic fish assemblages performed deeper by Kovačić et al (2012) and Glavičić et al (2016). The present research used the cryptobenthic fish definition of Kovačić et al (2012) based on the fish position at the bottom, so the aim was to study the fish assemblage in the hidden physical space, "inside bottom" (cryptobenthic in this work), and to compare it with the fish assemblage laying on the open bottom (epibenthic in this work).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations