2002
DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mef011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Quantitative Approach for Estimating Exposure to Pesticides in the Agricultural Health Study

Abstract: We developed a quantitative method to estimate long-term chemical-specific pesticide exposures in a large prospective cohort study of more than 58000 pesticide applicators in North Carolina and Iowa. An enrollment questionnaire was administered to applicators to collect basic time- and intensity-related information on pesticide exposure such as mixing condition, duration and frequency of application, application methods and personal protective equipment used. In addition, a detailed take-home questionnaire was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
90
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
90
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The association we observed was with ever use of glyphosate and cumulative exposure days of use (a combination of duration and frequency), but not with intensity of exposure. Estimated intensity of glyphosate exposure was based on general work practices that were not glyphosate specific, including the percentage of time spent mixing and applying pesticides, application method, use of personal protective equipment, and repair of pesticide application equipment (Dosemeci et al 2002). Information on work practices specific to glyphosate use would clarify whether intensity of exposure contributes to myeloma risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The association we observed was with ever use of glyphosate and cumulative exposure days of use (a combination of duration and frequency), but not with intensity of exposure. Estimated intensity of glyphosate exposure was based on general work practices that were not glyphosate specific, including the percentage of time spent mixing and applying pesticides, application method, use of personal protective equipment, and repair of pesticide application equipment (Dosemeci et al 2002). Information on work practices specific to glyphosate use would clarify whether intensity of exposure contributes to myeloma risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tertiles were chosen a priori as the cut points with which to categorize exposure data, to avoid sparse data for rare cancers in the high-exposure categories. Intensity levels were estimated using questionnaire data from enrollment and measurement data from the published pesticide exposure literature, as follows: intensity level = [(mixing status + application method + equipment repair status) × personal protective equipment use] (Dosemeci et al 2002). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lifetime exposure-days was defined as the product of the number of years a participant personally mixed or applied carbofuran and the number of days in an average year that carbofuran was used. In addition, we incorporated an algorithm developed by Dosemeci et al (2002) to estimate an exposure intensity score and applied it to lifetime exposure-days metric. Briefly, the intensity score was designed to incorporate aspects of pesticide use that can modify actual exposure, including whether an applicator personally mixed or prepared the pesticides for application, what type of application methods were used, the repair of pesticide application equipment, and the use of personal protective equipment during these activities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IWLD of captan exposure was calculated by multiplying LDs of captan exposure by the captan exposure intensity score. Methods for calculating the exposure intensity score are described in detail in Dosemeci et al [20] and are based on an applicator's frequency of personally mixing pesticides, application methods used, involvement in repair of application equipment, and use of personal protective equipment while working with pesticides. Applicators who had any exposure to captan were divided into tertiles of captan exposure, based on levels among all cancer cases combined.…”
Section: Exposure Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%