1966
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.55.3.664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quantitative analysis of the binding of N-acyl derivatives of alpha-aminoamides by alpha-chymotrypsin.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1970
1970
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining question, whether pH-dependent productive binding or pH-dependent nonproductive binding is responsible for the pH-Ais effects observed with anilides, is still open. The determinant formulation of Hamilton et al (1966) has been used in an attempt to resolve this question. There is, however, some question whether the empirical microscopic binding terms derived by Hamilton et al for unsubstituted amides of iV-acylamino acids are valid for anilide substrates and inhibitors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The remaining question, whether pH-dependent productive binding or pH-dependent nonproductive binding is responsible for the pH-Ais effects observed with anilides, is still open. The determinant formulation of Hamilton et al (1966) has been used in an attempt to resolve this question. There is, however, some question whether the empirical microscopic binding terms derived by Hamilton et al for unsubstituted amides of iV-acylamino acids are valid for anilide substrates and inhibitors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until the procedure of Hamilton et al is used in a complete sense, including the calculation of microscopic binding constants for anilides, it is apparent that the method cannot be relied upon to provide an unambiguous answer to the problem of nonproductive binding. Considering the cautions, which Hamilton et al (1966) discuss in the use of calculations of this type, it might appear that another method, such as crystal structure determinations, might be a more appropriate way of studying this problem (Robertus et al, 1972).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a monomeric enzyme which shows no allosteric effects; the structural transitions which occur in the process of peptide bond cleavage are very small; and it can transfer acyl groups from a variety of donors, such as peptides or esters, to a variety of acceptors, such as water, alcohols, or amines. Comparisons among different donors and among different acceptors greatly facilitated the analysis of the individual catalytic steps (733,734).…”
Section: The Catalytic Mechanism Of Chymotrypsinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonproductive binding provides a simple mechanism for the utilization of binding energy to bring about a decrease in the rate at which an enzyme catalyzes the reactions of poor substrates (25,(63)(64)(65)(66)(67). It is similar to the induced-fit mechanism in that it can be utilized to bring about specificity and that it does not facilitate the catalytic process per se.…”
Section: Nonproductive Bindingmentioning
confidence: 99%