1948
DOI: 10.1128/jb.56.2.177-186.1948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Quantitative Analysis of the Resistance of Mycobacteria to Streptomycin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1949
1949
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the following experiments a larger inbculum was employed, as this increases the chance of finding primarily streptomycin-resistant variant$. Furthermore, the incubation period was prolonged, because in previous determinations of the resistance the writer had observed that sometimes growth would appear in higher streptomycin concentrations when the incubatioii period was prolongedin conformity with observations reported by Youmans & Willi~ton*~ (1948) and Yegian & Vanderlinde= (1948). With two of the strains, moreover, old cultures were employed for inoculum, as it has been established that old cultures, with their cells in their terminal phase, are more resistant to chemicals (Thjetta16, 1946).…”
Section: This Outcome Agrees Very Well With the Conclusion Arrived Atsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In the following experiments a larger inbculum was employed, as this increases the chance of finding primarily streptomycin-resistant variant$. Furthermore, the incubation period was prolonged, because in previous determinations of the resistance the writer had observed that sometimes growth would appear in higher streptomycin concentrations when the incubatioii period was prolongedin conformity with observations reported by Youmans & Willi~ton*~ (1948) and Yegian & Vanderlinde= (1948). With two of the strains, moreover, old cultures were employed for inoculum, as it has been established that old cultures, with their cells in their terminal phase, are more resistant to chemicals (Thjetta16, 1946).…”
Section: This Outcome Agrees Very Well With the Conclusion Arrived Atsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Various investigators have tested populations from large cultures. Although the size of the mutant clones in replicates of each culture was approximately the same (3,5,9,19), the sizes of the clones between strains varied considerably (1-3, 5,8,9,13,19). The reason for the wide fluctuation in the proportion of mutants between strains is clearly indicated by the results of the fluctuation analysis: the size of the mutant clone depends upon the time when the first mutation occurred and, therefore, the proportion of mutants in a growing culture should increase with time (6, 11, 15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All colonies surviving 32 units, or more, per ml were of the latter type (table 1). This absence of intermediate forms possessing higher degrees of resistance has also been found in Hemwphilus influenzae (Alexander and Leidy, 1947), and in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium ranae (Yegian and Vanderlinde, 1948). The Meningococcus data (Miller and Bohnhoff, 1947) appear at first sight to constitute an exception, but the apparent difference could be due to the use of surface platings, a condition that greatly reduces the selective action of the drug.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%