2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12220-021-00793-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Quantification of a Besicovitch Non-linear Projection Theorem via Multiscale Analysis

Abstract: The Besicovitch projection theorem states that if a subset E of the plane has finite length in the sense of Hausdorff measure and is purely unrectifiable (so its intersection with any Lipschitz graph has zero length), then almost every orthogonal projection of E to a line will have zero measure. In other words, the Favard length of a purely unrectifiable 1-set vanishes. In this article, we show that when linear projections are replaced by certain non-linear projections called curve projections, this result rem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that a deeper investigation of the result of Corollary 2.6 is followed up on in [2, 3], where we obtain upper and lower bounds on the rate of decay as n$n\rightarrow \infty$ of the probability that a unit circle intersects the n th generation in the construction of the four corner Cantor set, Cfalse(1/4false)$C(1/4)$. Further, in [2, 4], we obtain similar quantitative information for more general irregular 1‐sets.…”
Section: Main Results When γ Has Non‐vanishing Curvaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We note that a deeper investigation of the result of Corollary 2.6 is followed up on in [2, 3], where we obtain upper and lower bounds on the rate of decay as n$n\rightarrow \infty$ of the probability that a unit circle intersects the n th generation in the construction of the four corner Cantor set, Cfalse(1/4false)$C(1/4)$. Further, in [2, 4], we obtain similar quantitative information for more general irregular 1‐sets.…”
Section: Main Results When γ Has Non‐vanishing Curvaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We extend the curve Γ and introduce extension operators so that Φλ(a)$\Phi _\lambda (a)$ is defined for each λfalse[0,2Lfalse]$\lambda \in [0,2L]$ and each aA$a\in A$. To this end, extend the function γ on I to a function γ$\widetilde{\gamma }$ on trueI=[L2,2L]$\widetilde{I}=[ -\frac{L}{2},2L ]$ so that trueΓbadbreak={false(t,trueγ(t)false):tI}\begin{equation*} \widetilde{\Gamma }= \lbrace (t, \widetilde{\gamma }(t)) : t\in \widetilde{I} \rbrace \end{equation*}is a good curve in the sense of Definition 4.1; The details of this extension are given in [4, Section 2.3]. For x=(x1,x2)normalΩ=false[0,L2false]2$x = (x_1, x_2) \in \Omega =[0, \frac{L}{2}]^2$ and λfalse[0,2Lfalse]$\lambda \in [0,2L]$, define normalΦλ(x)badbreak=x2goodbreak+trueγ(λx1).\begin{equation} \widetilde{\Phi }_\lambda (x) ...…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation