2018
DOI: 10.1017/ice.2018.271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Quality Control Circle Process to Reduce Blood Culture Contamination Rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since 2001, QCC was introduced to medical institutions in China in order to improve the quality of medical services by strengthening medical workers' awareness for discovering and solving medical problems, it is widely used in many aspects of improving medical quality. For example to reduce blood culture contamination rates for department of clinical laboratory (12), improve the intraocular lens power calculation for ophthalmology department (13), improve the hand hygiene compliance (14), reduce the incidence of catheter-associated urinary tract infection for department of nosocomial infection control (15), and so on. However, to our knowledge, no studies have been reported on QCC reducing carbapenem resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 2001, QCC was introduced to medical institutions in China in order to improve the quality of medical services by strengthening medical workers' awareness for discovering and solving medical problems, it is widely used in many aspects of improving medical quality. For example to reduce blood culture contamination rates for department of clinical laboratory (12), improve the intraocular lens power calculation for ophthalmology department (13), improve the hand hygiene compliance (14), reduce the incidence of catheter-associated urinary tract infection for department of nosocomial infection control (15), and so on. However, to our knowledge, no studies have been reported on QCC reducing carbapenem resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definition of contamination varied widely amongst the studies included in this review. Nine (15.8%) (26,31,40,43,46,51,63,69,80) studies did not define contamination at all. The majority (34,59.6%) of studies used species-based criteria for the definition of contamination with provisions that a contaminant could be considered a true pathogen if it was found in multiple cultures (6, 13, 20, 22, 24, 25, 28-30, 33, 34, 36-38, 44, 45, 47, 48, 50, 55-59, 61, 65-67, 70, 74-76, 78, 79).…”
Section: Definition Of Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were eight other outcome measures reported in 57 studies: true positive rate (n=10, 17.5%) (6,32,34,35,43,54,56,60,61,78); cost savings (n=4, 7%) (27,50,67,68), gramnegative isolates (n=2, 3.5%) (42,54), blood volume (35), staff preference (50), time required for skin asepsis (50), time to positive (78) and multiple sets (26).…”
Section: Other Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the activities of the QCC, the x 2 test or t test are often used to evaluate the effect of interventions, 11 which are not rigorous enough in some situations, for example, the data may contain a secular trend before the interventions, therefore exaggerating the effect of interventions. However, interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) can balance the trends of the data before the interventions and examine the real impact of countermeasures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%