2018
DOI: 10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-17-00059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Qualitative Study of Sexual Assault Disclosure Impact and Help-Seeking on Support Providers

Abstract: Friends, family, and significant others who receive disclosures of sexual assault from survivors are also susceptible to the effects of trauma. Most studies on the impact of sexual assault disclosure focus on the experiences of friends of survivors but not significant others or family members, and do not examine support provider’s (SP’s) help-seeking behaviors. This study of 45 matched pairs of sexual assault survivors and SPs explored the impact of receiving a disclosure and dealing with the emotional weight … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three overarching themes appeared in the dyadic sample that sometimes manifested in unique ways based on the relationship type: (a) differing opinions on helpfulness of formal support services sought; (b) barriers and facilitators to seeking formal help post assault; and (c) struggles to communicate/support formal help-seeking needs. Prior analyses of these data examined the impact of sexual assault disclosure on different relationship types in general (Kirkner et al, 2018), but not how formal help-seeking was viewed and/or sought within the dyadic relationships. In the final sample, five matched pairs described their relationship as “significant other,” nine matched pairs identified as family relationships, and 14 matched pairs described their relationship as “friends.” Descriptive information on types of formal support sought by survivors is presented in Table 1…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three overarching themes appeared in the dyadic sample that sometimes manifested in unique ways based on the relationship type: (a) differing opinions on helpfulness of formal support services sought; (b) barriers and facilitators to seeking formal help post assault; and (c) struggles to communicate/support formal help-seeking needs. Prior analyses of these data examined the impact of sexual assault disclosure on different relationship types in general (Kirkner et al, 2018), but not how formal help-seeking was viewed and/or sought within the dyadic relationships. In the final sample, five matched pairs described their relationship as “significant other,” nine matched pairs identified as family relationships, and 14 matched pairs described their relationship as “friends.” Descriptive information on types of formal support sought by survivors is presented in Table 1…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to previous research (Edwards & Dardis, 2016), we sought to further expand attribution theory to include additional constructs. More specifically, we sought to describe the frequency with which disclosure recipient–specific (i.e., gender, race, sexual orientation, age, DSV victimization history, PTSD, general alcohol use, victim empathy, and victim blame), victim-specific (i.e., gender, age, perceptions of how upset the victim has been during the past month, perceptions of how well the victim is coping with the experience), relationship-specific (i.e., victim-perpetrator closeness, disclosure recipient-victim closeness), and situation-specific (i.e., victim alcohol use at the time of the assault, victim distress at the time of the disclosure, victim alcohol use at the time of the disclosure, disclose recipient alcohol use at the time of the disclosure) variables that theory and/or research (the vast majority of which is cross-sectional) suggest are related to disclosure recipients’ social reactions to DSV disclosures (Edwards & Dardis, 2016; Kirkner et al, 2018; Sylaska & Edwards, 2014; Ullman, 2010; West & Wandrei, 2002).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coworkers and supervisors listen sympathetically and acknowledge other people's feelings (i.e., emotional support). Coworkers and supervisors also provide physical aid and tangible assistance by giving advice and knowledge for solving problems (i.e., instrumental support; Fenlason and Beehr, 1994). Cohen and Wills (1985) theorized that social support directly affects stress through the self-esteem-enhancing effects of social acceptance.…”
Section: Coworker and Supervisor Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%