“…Similar to previous research (Edwards & Dardis, 2016), we sought to further expand attribution theory to include additional constructs. More specifically, we sought to describe the frequency with which disclosure recipient–specific (i.e., gender, race, sexual orientation, age, DSV victimization history, PTSD, general alcohol use, victim empathy, and victim blame), victim-specific (i.e., gender, age, perceptions of how upset the victim has been during the past month, perceptions of how well the victim is coping with the experience), relationship-specific (i.e., victim-perpetrator closeness, disclosure recipient-victim closeness), and situation-specific (i.e., victim alcohol use at the time of the assault, victim distress at the time of the disclosure, victim alcohol use at the time of the disclosure, disclose recipient alcohol use at the time of the disclosure) variables that theory and/or research (the vast majority of which is cross-sectional) suggest are related to disclosure recipients’ social reactions to DSV disclosures (Edwards & Dardis, 2016; Kirkner et al, 2018; Sylaska & Edwards, 2014; Ullman, 2010; West & Wandrei, 2002).…”