A qualitative study of ethical, medico-legal and clinical governance matters in Australian telehealth services

Abstract

We examined how Australian telehealth service providers perceived and addressed ethical, medico-legal and clinical governance matters arising from service delivery. Thirty-seven telehealth clinicians and managers were interviewed and a qualitative content analysis was conducted. The services covered six Australian jurisdictions and a range of clinical disciplines. There were 11 medical specialities, surgery, mental health, paediatrics, nursing and allied health. Thirty services (83%) used video consulting and 25 (68%) delivered services to rural areas. Telehealth was reported to be beneficial by reducing adverse events, improving health outcomes, offering increased patient choice of service delivery, and improving access to services for rural areas and home care. There were observations of gains or no change in patient-provider rapport compared to face-to-face communication, with some patients reportedly preferring video. Those interviewed reported some problems with privacy and security, and variable informed consent practices. No examples of malpractice were raised, although there was a common misperception that distant providers were not responsible for clinical care. With respect to clinical governance, telehealth was seen as enabling improved quality, integration and implementation of evidence-based care, and to be a major support for the rural health workforce. Although there were potential ethical, medico-legal and governance problems in Australian telehealth services, these had been easily managed in practice.

Barriers and Facilitators for Sustainability of Tele‐Homecare Programs: A Systematic Review

“…While financial reimbursements for tele‐homecare services by private or government health insurance agencies alone will not sustain tele‐homecare programs, they can certainly support tele‐homecare programs' economic feasibility (Wade et al. ).…”

Telemedicine ‐ is the cart being put before the horse?

“…Australia has the conditions under which telemedicine should flourish: geography limits access to specialists, technology is readily accessible and inexpensive, and provider reimbursement exists. Yet the uptake of telemedicine has been slow and patchy 12 . ‐ 14 While Medicare Benefit Schedule (MBS) item numbers for video‐based consultations between general practitioners, nurse practitioners, midwives, Aboriginal health workers and specialists were introduced in July 2011, 15 the uptake of telemedicine outside of the public hospital system has been low 16…”

A review of literature supporting the development of practice guidelines for teledermatology in Australia

“…Telehealth may raise additional privacy concerns due the inherent transmission of medical information . To ensure the privacy of transmitted information, encryption is essential.…”