A qualitative study exploring the benefits of involving young people in mental health research

Abstract

Introduction It is increasingly accepted that young people need to be centrally involved in research on issues that affect them. The aim of this study was to explore young people's perceptions of the benefits for them of being involved in mental health research and the processes that enabled these benefits. Methods Qualitative interviews were conducted by co‐researchers (young people with lived experience and/or interest in mental health) with 13 young people (aged 13–24 years) who had experience of being involved in mental health research when they were between 11 and 16 years of age. Reflective thematic analysis was used to identify important aspects of young people's experiences. Results Four main themes were identified: (1) opportunity to have a meaningful impact, (2) opportunity to be part of a supportive community, (3) opportunity to learn and grow and (4) increasing opportunities for young people. Conclusion This study highlights young people's experiences of being involved in mental health research and identifies ways in which researchers can ensure that involvement opportunities bring benefits to both the young people and the research. Patient or Public Contribution This research was a response to issues raised by young people involved in research. The project was supported by co‐researchers throughout, including design, data collection, analysis and write‐up.

Experiences of young adults affected by cancer within an 8-week yoga intervention delivered by videoconference: a qualitative interview study

“…Looking ahead, researchers should consider integrating qualitative interviews or other qualitative approaches (e.g. focus groups, photo elicitation) in their work with young adults so as to ensure their perspective is centred, which is something this population has shared they are interested in [ 36 ].…”

Recruitment and retention of adolescents for an ecological momentary assessment measurement burst mental health study: The MHIM engagement strategy

“…Second, while we conducted YPAGs to input on the engagement plan and members were sampled to be as diverse as possible, these inevitably gathered the input of only a small number of young people whose views do not necessarily reflect those of all prospective study participants. There is evidence that YPAGs tend to show a degree of self‐selection 73 , 74 and their views may therefore reflect those of young people who are more likely to be inclined to be engaged with research. Third, while we based our strategies on a comprehensive review of the literature, there are some areas where evidence is lacking and there is no specific evidence available on effective engagement strategies for longitudinal multimodal EMA burst studies like MHIM.…”

A systematic scoping review of peer support interventions in integrated primary youth mental health care

“…Reliable methodologies were employed throughout the review process. For example, a panel of young people were consulted to review the research questions, as recommended when conducting YMH research (Hawke et al, 2018;Watson et al, 2023); a specialist librarian assisted in the design of the search strategy; and the lead author was supervised during the search and screening process by experts in youth mental health research. This is also the first review to address the recommendations of Chinman et al (2017) and Gillard (2019) by using an implementation framework to examine the barriers and facilitators to uptake of peer support in YMH settings.…”