2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10879-020-09450-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Qualitative Meta-analytic Review of the Therapist Responsiveness Literature: Guidelines for Practice and Training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One principle involved discussion of goals for therapy to assess and adjust the goals themselves, frequency of sessions, and treatment termination. We suggest that our findings might contribute to a further refinement of responsiveness to client goals, which might have implications for and be in line with a process‐oriented training of therapists as suggested by Wu and Levitt (2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One principle involved discussion of goals for therapy to assess and adjust the goals themselves, frequency of sessions, and treatment termination. We suggest that our findings might contribute to a further refinement of responsiveness to client goals, which might have implications for and be in line with a process‐oriented training of therapists as suggested by Wu and Levitt (2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…One way of looking at our analysis is that it describes responsiveness to client future orientation. In their qualitative meta‐analytic review of the literature on therapist responsiveness, Wu and Levitt (2020) identified a number of clinical principles for responsiveness. One principle involved discussion of goals for therapy to assess and adjust the goals themselves, frequency of sessions, and treatment termination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research from the field of adolescent psychotherapy supports the significant contribution of common factors, like the alliance (Shirk et al, 2011;Fernandez et al, 2016;van Benthem et al, 2020), with some research indicating an interaction between an adolescent's attachment history and alliance, with the working alliance having a stronger relationship to outcomes in adolescent clients with poorer attachment histories (Zack et al, 2015). Empirical support for therapist flexibility and its impact on later client engagement and improvement in therapy has also been reported (Chu and Kendall, 2009), in line with the above-mentioned focus on therapist responsiveness (Hatcher, 2015;Wu and Levitt, 2020). Qualitative studies exploring the adolescent client's perspective on psychotherapy similarly point to the significance of the therapist-as-person (including transparency, benevolence, and authenticity), the therapist's management of key issues, like confidentiality, power imbalance, and client agency, and the client's feeling of being understood, as decisive for the perceived accessibility and usefulness of therapy (Binder et al, 2011;Sagen et al, 2013;Gibson et al, 2016;Lavik et al, 2018;Løvgren et al, 2019;Radez et al, 2021;Stige et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The significance of the initial meeting between therapist and client for the outcome of psychotherapy is reflected in the way early measurements of alliance predicts the outcome of psychotherapy across age groups ( Wampold, 2014 ). To succeed, both in establishing and maintaining alliance and collaboration, the therapist must be flexible and sensitive, accurately assessing what is going on in therapy, accessing the client’s perspective, and adjusting the content and timing of interventions to the individual client (i.e., therapist responsiveness; Stiles et al, 1998 ; Hatcher, 2015 ; Wu and Levitt, 2020 ). Psychotherapy, thus, consists of unique meetings between two persons, where both parties bring with them experiences and expectations that influence the evolving interaction ( Råbu and Moltu, 2020 ), but where the therapist bears particular responsibility – and especially so, in adolescent psychotherapy ( Bolton Oetzel and Scherer, 2003 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of these reviews focuses on either qualitative or quantitative studies, with the consequence that it is not possible to compare evidence generated by different methodological approaches. Reviews by Pomerville et al (2016 ), Greenhalgh et al (2018 ) and Wu and Levitt (2020 ) demonstrate how it is possible to incorporate findings of qualitative and quantitative studies in a single review. The Pomerville et al (2016 ) review takes a further pluralistic step in reporting review findings in terms of contrasting interpretative themes rather than a unified model.…”
Section: Pluralistically Oriented Therapy Research: Illustrative Case Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%