1997
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/14.1.49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A qualitative investigation into why patients change their GPs

Abstract: Patients change doctor after careful consideration and commonly for interpersonal reasons. There is usually one critical factor in the decision to change. Factors may be modifiable or non-modifiable. Critical event audit may enable GPs to analyse the reasons why patients leave their lists.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
32
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In most cases, the reasons for change were multifactorial. 38 In contrast to this study, a postal survey of British primary care patients who had not changed their address found that the most frequent reasons for changing doctors were distance issues (41%), dissatisfaction with care (35%), and dissatisfaction with practice organization (36%). 39 Safran 40 has identified reasons to be concerned about deterioration in the quality of doctor-patient relationship over the past several years.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…In most cases, the reasons for change were multifactorial. 38 In contrast to this study, a postal survey of British primary care patients who had not changed their address found that the most frequent reasons for changing doctors were distance issues (41%), dissatisfaction with care (35%), and dissatisfaction with practice organization (36%). 39 Safran 40 has identified reasons to be concerned about deterioration in the quality of doctor-patient relationship over the past several years.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…Patients whose symptoms were considered 'medically explained' expressed greater satisfaction overall, as well as on the 'rapport' subscale, than those whose symptoms were thought 'medically unexplained'. It has been argued that the 'rapport' subscale of the MISS-21 has particular clinical relevance because studies using other measures have demonstrated that interactions in which physicians are perceived as being empathic, reassuring and as showing positive affect are associated with better patient outcomes [34][35][36][37][38]. This subscale has previously been used in Conversation Analytic (CA) research and been shown to be sensitive to interactional features in primary care consultations [39].…”
Section: Does Choice Lead To Higher Patient Satisfaction?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, an allegation by the patient that the GP is incompetent or lies to the patient would be seen as a major breach of the rules. Other work, including that by Gandhi et al, 8 has similarly identified that a patient's decision to change GP was often triggered by the GP and/or practice staff being 'rude', the GP not being 'interested' in the patient and by the patient viewing the GP as clinically incompetent. Hayes-Bautista 14 also found that the evaluation by a patient that the practitioner was incompetent led to a patient-initiated termination of the relationship.…”
Section: The Removal Of Patients From Gps' Listsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of patient-initiated termination of the doctor-patient relationship has been explored using qualitative interviews with patients who have changed GP without changing address in both the UK 8 and New Zealand, 9 and was also explored by Hayes-Bautista. 14 Hayes-Bautista coined the phrase the 'fade out' to refer to patients who, having decided to terminate the relationship, choose not to return to that particular practitioner.…”
Section: 'Termination' Of the Doctor-patient Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation