2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A qualitative inquiry into methadone maintenance treatment for opioid-dependent prisoners in Tehran, Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inflated price for all three drug preparations in prison relative to the community that we found from our survey have also been reported for heroin in Iran (Zamani et al, 2010). Despite the increased availability of prescribed methadone in prison it is perceived as being significantly harder to sell in prison than both buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The inflated price for all three drug preparations in prison relative to the community that we found from our survey have also been reported for heroin in Iran (Zamani et al, 2010). Despite the increased availability of prescribed methadone in prison it is perceived as being significantly harder to sell in prison than both buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Our study indicated that approximately 70% of participants had a history of imprisonment, of which more than onefifth shared needles while in prison. Since 2005, harmreduction interventions inside Iranian prisons have been expanded; however, only one qualitative study has reported a significant decrease in injection drug use in one prison (32). We found that drug injection frequency of more than once per day and drug use duration of more than 10 years were associated with high rates of HCV infection.…”
Section: Variables Correlated With Hepatitis Cmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Among other interventions implemented in Iran are drop-in centers, integration of substance use treatment and HIV prevention into the rural primary health care system, and community education centers [62],[101]–[105]. These efforts appear to have been successful in reducing sharing of injecting equipment [106]–[108], though the coverage of harm reduction continues to be lower than adequate [104].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%