2009
DOI: 10.1177/160940690900800301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Qualitative Framework for Collecting and Analyzing Data in Focus Group Research

Abstract: Despite the abundance of published material on conducting focus groups, scant specific information exists on how to analyze focus group data in social science research. Thus, the authors provide a new qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing focus group data. First, they identify types of data that can be collected during focus groups. Second, they identify the qualitative data analysis techniques best suited for analyzing these data. Third, they introduce what they term as a micro-interlocutor analy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
859
0
41

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,193 publications
(959 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
4
859
0
41
Order By: Relevance
“…[7][8][9] The students' broad definition of how they perceived diversity is consistent along the domains of how most educational literature on diversity-related topics conceptualize diversity. However, students working while in school and students' pharmacist practice experience were also described by some respondents as a diversity issue that faculty members do not consider.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[7][8][9] The students' broad definition of how they perceived diversity is consistent along the domains of how most educational literature on diversity-related topics conceptualize diversity. However, students working while in school and students' pharmacist practice experience were also described by some respondents as a diversity issue that faculty members do not consider.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Strengths and weaknesses have been noted about the quality of group interactions, dynamics, and output with both methods. 8 Participants should also be made to feel comfortable with each other as familiarity among group members could affect discussions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A qualitative study, utilizing in-depth focus group interviews with refugee resettlement case managers, interpreters, and pharmacists with experiences in refugee care was used to identify and interpret major themes and to develop authentic descriptions of the phenomena we studied. 20,21 The project protocol was approved as not human subject research by the Aurora Health Care institutional review board.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lambert and Loiselle [27] note that the goal of a focus group is to use interaction data, which results from discussion among participants (questioning one another or commenting on one another's experiences) to increase the depth of the inquiry. In focus groups the researcher gains important insights into the phenomenon, while individual respondents share their experiences [28]. The aim of the focus group discussions was for participants to explore and indicate their level of agreement that a given criterion on the interview schedule suggests that the NPO is doing the right thing.…”
Section: Interviews With Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%