A Qualitative Exploration of UK Leisure Horse Owners’ Perceptions of Equine Wellbeing

Abstract

Human assessment of equine wellbeing is fundamental to ensuring the optimal care of domestic horses. However, terminology associated with wellbeing is still not fully defined and there are currently no validated quality of life (QoL) assessment tools. Furthermore, little is known about what equine wellbeing or QoL means to horse owners, or how their beliefs impact on the management decisions they make for their horse. This study sought to establish how UK leisure horse owners use wellbeing-related terminology by exploring their accounts within a focus group setting. Four online focus group discussions (FGD) were held and qualitative data were collected. FGDs involved a semi-structured discussion, followed by a group activity to compare seven equine wellbeing-related terms of interest introduced by the facilitator. The collected data were analysed using a constructivist grounded theory approach, and also by content analysis, to examine the frequency and subjective meaning of the terms of interest. The results showed that horse owners did not clearly delineate between different terms, rather, they used the terms in the context of their own assessments of their horse. The meanings assigned to what owners experienced with their horse were individual and subjective, shaped by past experiences, relationships with their animal, and peers or social groups. This individualised construction of equine wellbeing impacted on the meaning conveyed when using wellbeing-related terminology. In this study, we extend the literature on equine wellbeing terminology usage, and highlight differences between the academic literature and the real-world experiences of horse owners.

Analysis of the Usage Context of an mHealth Application for Equestrians

“…They seek support in health-related decisions for their horse from (in descending order) other horse owners, trainers, stable owners and internet/ friends/ family/ other [•]. There are three different types of typical decision-making procedures equestrians may follow: wait -observe -reassess/ provide medical care by themselves -reassess if necessary/ order a vet (mostly by phone) [19,27,28,39,40]. Aspects that need to be handled by the application: The equestrians may each follow individual life and health philosophies, whilst maintaining individual mental disease models (lay interpretations of diseases) [19,33].…”

The Behavioral Cost of Care: Changes in Maintenance Behavior during Equine-Assisted Interventions

“…For a review of the model's development and evolution, see Mellor et al [21]. In brief, the model currently suggests that welfare should address positive experiences and a life worth living [22], not simply a life without physical or emotional pain. In examining the behavioral domain, King and colleagues [23] observed signs of stress in dogs following an animal-assisted therapy session, including panting and yawning.…”

Highlights of recent clinically relevant papers

“…This study by Rebecca Smith and UK‐based co‐workers explored UK leisure horse‐owners' perceptions of equine well‐being .…”