2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2023.101744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A qualitative exploration of perceived barriers and facilitators to following an intuitive eating style

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be that a reliance on hunger and satiety sensations are complex and, while RHSC items contribute to an overarching intuitive eating construct, they are less important in their own right. For instance, some qualitative research has found that, while individuals understand the importance of listening to and respecting internal cues when trying to eat intuitively, doing so on a daily basis was often challenging (Loor, Mullins, Pacheco, VanderJagt, & Smith, 2023;Vorlet & Carrard, 2023). In fact, individuals may sometimes find it difficult to trust their physiological cues or to listen to their hunger and satiety cues in certain environments (e.g., due to family obligations or schedules, or when eating out).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be that a reliance on hunger and satiety sensations are complex and, while RHSC items contribute to an overarching intuitive eating construct, they are less important in their own right. For instance, some qualitative research has found that, while individuals understand the importance of listening to and respecting internal cues when trying to eat intuitively, doing so on a daily basis was often challenging (Loor, Mullins, Pacheco, VanderJagt, & Smith, 2023;Vorlet & Carrard, 2023). In fact, individuals may sometimes find it difficult to trust their physiological cues or to listen to their hunger and satiety cues in certain environments (e.g., due to family obligations or schedules, or when eating out).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%