2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A qualitative examination of the implementation of continuity of care: An organizational learning perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variables such as teacher education, centre size, resources and poor teacher-child ratios correlated directly to less emotional sensitivity and responsiveness in teachers (Gerber et al, 2007;Pauker et al, 2018;Pianta, Barnett, Burchinal & Thornburg, 2009). The educational development of children in ECES may be at risk if the settings are unstable (for example, high staff turn-over), if teacher sensitivity is inconsistent (how individual teachers view children), or if the child attends multiple care settings (Ahnert et al, 2006;Garrity et al, 2016;Lang et al, 2016;Linke & Fleer, 2002;Page, 2014;Pauker et al, 2018;Pilarz & Hill, 2014). Continuity of care and minimising change in relationships for infants and toddlers in non-parental care was only beginning to be recognised in research at the turn of the 20 th century (Cryer et al, 2005;Howes & Hamilton, 1993;Howes & Smith, 1995;Zigler & Lang, 1991).…”
Section: Background and Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variables such as teacher education, centre size, resources and poor teacher-child ratios correlated directly to less emotional sensitivity and responsiveness in teachers (Gerber et al, 2007;Pauker et al, 2018;Pianta, Barnett, Burchinal & Thornburg, 2009). The educational development of children in ECES may be at risk if the settings are unstable (for example, high staff turn-over), if teacher sensitivity is inconsistent (how individual teachers view children), or if the child attends multiple care settings (Ahnert et al, 2006;Garrity et al, 2016;Lang et al, 2016;Linke & Fleer, 2002;Page, 2014;Pauker et al, 2018;Pilarz & Hill, 2014). Continuity of care and minimising change in relationships for infants and toddlers in non-parental care was only beginning to be recognised in research at the turn of the 20 th century (Cryer et al, 2005;Howes & Hamilton, 1993;Howes & Smith, 1995;Zigler & Lang, 1991).…”
Section: Background and Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variables such as teacher education, centre size, resources and poor teacher-child ratios correlated directly to less sensitivity in teachers (Gerber et al 2007;Pauker et al 2018). The educational development of children in ECES may be at risk if the settings are unstable (for example, high staff turn-over), if teacher sensitivity is inconsistent (how individual teachers view children), or if the child attends multiple care settings (Ahnert et al 2006;Garrity et al 2016;Lang et al 2016;Linke and Fleer 2002;Page 2014;Pauker et al 2018;Pilarz and Hill 2014). Continuity of care and minimising change in relationships for infants and toddlers in non-parental care was only beginning to be recognised in research at the turn of the 20 th century (Cryer et al 2005;Howes and Hamilton 1993;Howes and Smith 1995;Zigler and Lang 1991).…”
Section: Background and Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is conceptualized in many different ways by health and social care professionals and individuals across communities and population. Although it is a highlight component in mental healthcare [2,3], community healthcare [4,5], chronic diseases care [6,7] and elder patients' care [8], continuity of care is still not clearly defined in healthcare system [1]. A concept analysis of continuity of care can establish essential components and provide guidance to both researching and clinical practice.…”
Section: Introduction mentioning
confidence: 99%