A Qualitative Examination of the Experience of ‘Depression’ in Hospitalized Medically Ill Patients

Abstract

Background: Research into depression in the medically ill has progressed without sufficient attention being given to the validity, in this group, of the taxonomic categories. We aimed to describe, using qualitative interviews, the experience of ‘being depressed’, separating experiences that are unique to depression from experiences that are common to being ill and in hospital. Method: Forty-nine patients hospitalized for medical illness underwent a 30-min interview in which they were asked to ‘Describe how you have been unwell and, in particular, how that has made you feel.’ From the transcripts, a ‘folk’ taxonomy was constructed using a phenomenological framework involving four steps: frame elicitation to identify the important themes, componential analysis to systematically cluster the attributes into domains, a comparison of the experiences of patients screening depressed and not-depressed, and a theoretical analysis comparing the resulting taxonomy with currently used theoretical constructs. Results: Experiences common to all patients were being in hospital, being ill or in pain, adjusting to not being able to do things, and having time to think. In addition, all participants described being depressed, down or sad. Patients who were identified by screening as being depressed described unique experiences of depression, which included ‘having to think about things’ (a forceful intrusive thinking), ‘not being able to sleep’, ‘having to rely on others’, ‘being a burden’ to others (with associated shame and guilt), feelings of ‘not getting better’ and ‘feeling like giving up’. Theoretical analysis suggested that this experience of depression fitted well with the concept of demoralization described by Jerome Frank. Conclusions: Demoralization, which involves feelings of being unable to cope, helplessness, hopelessness and diminished personal esteem, characterizes much of the depression seen in hospitalized medically ill patients.

What is the relationship between diabetes and depression? A qualitative meta-synthesis of patient experience of co-morbidity

“…Diabetes is associated with considerable emotional consequences, of which 'depression' may be one, although the experience is very varied and includes a wide range of symptoms and processes, and which may be better captured by alternative labels such as 'diabetes-related distress' 43 or even 'demoralisation'. 44 Although the diagnosis and management of diabetes could lead to a recognizable experience of clinical depression, the impact of the condition was not uniform in this respect, and it depended on contextual factors such as the processes surrounding diagnosis. Although managing diabetes is dependent on effective relationships with professionals and the wider family, diabetes can impact on those relationships in a way that increases distress further.…”

What do general practitioners think depression is? A taxonomy of distress and depression for general practice

“…This is the most common form of distress, although it is expressed along a continuum with “worry” prominent at one end (sometimes referred to as “stress”) and helplessness–hopelessness at the other. The latter, accompanied by feelings of “not coping”, is very similar in its severest form to the experience of demoralisation observed in the severely medically ill 15 , 16 . The most common forms of sleep disturbance — difficulty getting to sleep or staying asleep — were associated with anxiety and worry.…”

Mental disorders in patients with breast cancer: a differentiated approach to the study of nozogeny

“…В 6 случаях оно развилось у больных с диссоциативной нозогенной реакцией в анамнезе и еще в 6 -с тревожно-фобической. Характерными клиническими признаками данного типа развития личности являлись стойкие аффективные расстройства (гипотимия) с явлением «деморализации» [31] и выраженной тревогой с ипохондрическими фобиями, канцеро-и танатофобией.…”