2014
DOI: 10.13031/jash.20.10425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Qualitative Analysis of Power Take-Off Driveline Shields: Barriers and Motivators to Shield Use for New York State Farmers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Operators appeared skeptical about the actual efficacy of newly-introduced standard requirements and proved particularly frustrated by safety solutions interfering in the management of their working activities on the operative level. This complies with a study by Weil et al [7] on PTO driveline shielding, in which farmers were interviewed and reported that limited time and resources make work safety unfeasible and that "anything that interferes with getting the job done, or that costs more time and money, has a definite impacts on the livelihood of the farmers". These factors encourage farmers to believe that it is the better to rely on common sense, best practices and experiences rather than technical wood chipper protective devices.…”
Section: Safety Attitudesupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Operators appeared skeptical about the actual efficacy of newly-introduced standard requirements and proved particularly frustrated by safety solutions interfering in the management of their working activities on the operative level. This complies with a study by Weil et al [7] on PTO driveline shielding, in which farmers were interviewed and reported that limited time and resources make work safety unfeasible and that "anything that interferes with getting the job done, or that costs more time and money, has a definite impacts on the livelihood of the farmers". These factors encourage farmers to believe that it is the better to rely on common sense, best practices and experiences rather than technical wood chipper protective devices.…”
Section: Safety Attitudesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Potential respondents were contacted by telephone and given a short description of the study. Prior to each interview, subjects were briefed on the purpose of the survey and their rights as research participants [7]. All respondents provided informed consent.…”
Section: Individual In-depth Interviews With Operators Of the Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The number of research works dealing with the behavior of the operators is also noteworthy. In particular, most studies included in this research stream investigated the user attitude towards safety practices and risk-taking behavior [18,[127][128][129], including their perception of safety issues [37]. Jenkins et al [130] surveyed motivations and barriers to the safe use of tractors among farmers.…”
Section: User Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%