“…Next, we applied the aforementioned criteria (C2-C5). Consequently, 20 studies (Bandell-Hoekstra et al, 2002;Caes, Fisher, Clinch, Tobias, & Eccleston, 2015;Carter et al, 2002;Castarlenas et al, 2015;Donovan et al, 2013;Eccleston, Wastell, Crombez, & Jordan, 2008;Forgeron et al, 2011;Forgeron & McGrath, 2008;Greco et al, 2007;Guite, Logan, Sherry, & Rose, 2007;Karwautz et al, 1999;Kashikar-Zuck et al, 2007;Konijnenberg et al, 2005;Langeveld et al, 1997;Larsson & Sund, 2007;Meldrum et al, 2009;Metsähonkala et al, 1998;Vannatta et al, 2008;van Tilburg et al, 2015) met inclusion criteria and were included in the review (Figure 1). The two articles excluded for not being primary sources (C1) were fully reviewed to scan their reference lists because one of them was an outstanding systematic review, and the other was a commentary related to the aims of our study.…”