2020
DOI: 10.18671/scifor.v48n127.04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A qualidade morfológica de mudas de Pinus taeda afeta o seu crescimento em campo no longo prazo?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A few studies followed tree growth until the middle to the end of rotation, many of them in the Pinus plantation [39][40][41]. The authors of [31] found a reduction of 42% of the mean annual increment from the best to the worst treatments (25 × 43 m 3 ha −1 yr −1 ) in Pinus taeda at 9 years after planting. This study showed that one of the main reasons for the loss of productivity was the age of seedlings, corroborating our results, where treatment D had 12% less productivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A few studies followed tree growth until the middle to the end of rotation, many of them in the Pinus plantation [39][40][41]. The authors of [31] found a reduction of 42% of the mean annual increment from the best to the worst treatments (25 × 43 m 3 ha −1 yr −1 ) in Pinus taeda at 9 years after planting. This study showed that one of the main reasons for the loss of productivity was the age of seedlings, corroborating our results, where treatment D had 12% less productivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A randomized block design was carried out with four treatments and four repetitions, with a total of 16 plots. In our study, treatment refers to the morphological condition of seedlings, as it was applied by Pezzuti and Caldato (2011) [30] and Trazzi et al (2020) [31]. The plots were represented by 81 plants (9 rows × 9 plants), with a useful area containing 25 plants in the central region of the plots (5 rows × 5 plants).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%