2012
DOI: 10.5402/2012/260171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A QSPR Study for the Prediction of the pKa of N-Base Ligands and Formation Constant Kc of Bis(2,2′-bipyridine)Platinum(II)-N-Base Adducts Using Quantum Mechanically Derived Descriptors

Abstract: Quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) study on the acid dissociation constant, pKa of various 22 N-base ligands including pyridines, pyrimidines, purines, and quinolines has been carried out using Codessa Pro methodology and software. In addition, the formation constant, Kc of these ligands with Pt(II)(bpy) 2 2+ (bpy = 2,2 -bipyridine) ion has also been modelled with the same methodology. Linear regression QSPR models of pKa and Kc were established with descriptors derived from AM1 calculations. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several pK a prediction programs exist (Liao and Nicklaus, 2009). Commercial predictors span a range of mechanisms to predict the protonation state of particular atoms, including linear free energy relationships (LFER) that use a dictionary of chemical substructures (Lee et al, 2007), quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPR) (Jover et al, 2008;Palaz et al, 2012), and quantum chemical and ab initio methods (Bochevarov et al, 2013;Eckert and Klamt, 2006;Eckert et al, 2009;Klamt et al, 2010;Klamt et al, 2003;Vareková et al, 2011). Semi-empirical models calculate descriptors for each ionizable chemical functional group, after which pK a values are predicted using machine learning or tree-based models (Jelfs et al, 2007;Xing et al, 2003).…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several pK a prediction programs exist (Liao and Nicklaus, 2009). Commercial predictors span a range of mechanisms to predict the protonation state of particular atoms, including linear free energy relationships (LFER) that use a dictionary of chemical substructures (Lee et al, 2007), quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPR) (Jover et al, 2008;Palaz et al, 2012), and quantum chemical and ab initio methods (Bochevarov et al, 2013;Eckert and Klamt, 2006;Eckert et al, 2009;Klamt et al, 2010;Klamt et al, 2003;Vareková et al, 2011). Semi-empirical models calculate descriptors for each ionizable chemical functional group, after which pK a values are predicted using machine learning or tree-based models (Jelfs et al, 2007;Xing et al, 2003).…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A QSPR study using quantum descriptors was reported to predict the acid dissociation constant and the formation constant of 22 compounds including pyridines, purines, pyrimidines, and quinoline …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…0.95 sic.) [16] for N-Base ligands at the semi empirical AM1 level of theory, as well as a Principal Components Analysis (PCA) for organic and inorganic acids (RMSE = 0.0195) [17]. Moreover, genetic algorithms (GA) and neural networks (NN) have employed frontier orbital energies for a chemical space of sixty commercial drugs [18] (GA, R 2 = 0.703; NN, R 2 = 0.929).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%