2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-018-7058-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A QoE-perceived screen updates transmission scheme in desktop virtualization environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scheme comparison is carried out, and in the paper [33], the same author does compare the RDP with the ICA protocol. Studies have shown that these common cloud desktop protocols each have their own areas of adaptation, but most of the research is not based on real scene environments, and most of the research work is based on some simulation verification platforms, such as NetEm [34], and other simulation environment tools with certain random packet loss and link delay.…”
Section: Algorithms For Daas Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scheme comparison is carried out, and in the paper [33], the same author does compare the RDP with the ICA protocol. Studies have shown that these common cloud desktop protocols each have their own areas of adaptation, but most of the research is not based on real scene environments, and most of the research work is based on some simulation verification platforms, such as NetEm [34], and other simulation environment tools with certain random packet loss and link delay.…”
Section: Algorithms For Daas Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem with this proposal is that there is not a direct mapping between the service and the network metrics. Conversely, Hongdi Zheng et al [40] used the time between screen updates to evaluate the QoE of users in different transmission schemes for desktop virtualization environments, with a low frequency being indicative of a worse user experience. However, the time between screen updates is not compared with user's actions within the system.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%