2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-003-0365-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Q4/Q4 continuum structural topology optimization implementation

Abstract: A node-based design variable implementation for continuum structural topology optimization in a finite element framework is presented and its properties are explored in the context of solving a number of different design examples. Since the implementation ensures C 0 continuity of design variables, it is immune to elementwise checkerboarding instabilities that are a concern with element-based design variables. Nevertheless, in a subset of design examples considered, especially those involving compliance minimi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
80
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also note that similar formulations based on the SIMP method were presented in Refs. (21) and (22). Although they pointed out some numerical problems such as "layering" and "islanding" when using coarse meshes, the numerical examples obtained by the method proposed here will show clear optimal configurations given sufficiently fine meshes, without the above problems.…”
Section: Compliant Mechanism Design Using Topology Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Also note that similar formulations based on the SIMP method were presented in Refs. (21) and (22). Although they pointed out some numerical problems such as "layering" and "islanding" when using coarse meshes, the numerical examples obtained by the method proposed here will show clear optimal configurations given sufficiently fine meshes, without the above problems.…”
Section: Compliant Mechanism Design Using Topology Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Also note that similar formulations based on the SIMP method were presented by Rahmatalla and Swan [42,43]. Although they pointed out some numerical problems such as 'layering' and 'islanding' using coarse meshes [43], the numerical examples obtained by the method proposed here will show clear optimal configurations, without the above problems. The reason why such phenomena do not occur in our proposed method is not clear, and we plan to investigate this in detail in the future.…”
Section: Continuous Approximation Of Materials Distribution In Design mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…However, numerical instabilities such as checkerboard patterns or mesh-dependencies are observed if the parameters of micro-structure or the density is constructed by a constant function in each finite element and they are varied using a gradient method [6,7]. If the design parameters are approximated by continuous functions [8], it is known that a numerical instability, such as the socalled island phenomena, is observed [9]. In addition, although many numerical schemes have been proposed to overcome such numerical instabilities [10,11], regularity in the sense of functional analysis has not been shown.…”
Section: Problem 1 (Topology Optimization Problem)mentioning
confidence: 99%