2008
DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.2008.081009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A puzzling omission in a great medical textbook edited by a pioneer of controlled trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Duncan Neuhauser, Mireya Diaz and Iain Chalmers () are puzzled that one of the great pioneers of clinical trials, Russell LaFayette Cecil, failed to include a chapter on trial methodology when he went on to edit his best-selling Textbook of Medicine – but perhaps they are being diplomatic 1 . If Cecil thought most doctors did not need to worry their heads about science he was merely reflecting the profession's long-standing ambivalence to science after two millennia of reliance on Galenic teaching and personal experience.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duncan Neuhauser, Mireya Diaz and Iain Chalmers () are puzzled that one of the great pioneers of clinical trials, Russell LaFayette Cecil, failed to include a chapter on trial methodology when he went on to edit his best-selling Textbook of Medicine – but perhaps they are being diplomatic 1 . If Cecil thought most doctors did not need to worry their heads about science he was merely reflecting the profession's long-standing ambivalence to science after two millennia of reliance on Galenic teaching and personal experience.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%