1970
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(70)90049-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pulse height discriminator and post-stimulus histogram system using integrated circuits

Abstract: Integrated circuits can be used to construct a compact, relatively inexpensive device which performs the functions of spike amplitude discrimination and digital post-stimulus histogram generation. The logic diagram, detailed schematic, and tnode of operation of such a system is presented and discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1981
1981

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The signals were amplified and displayed on a CRO and an audio monitor. In addition, the signal could be sent to an averaging instrument (Mnenotron CAT 400) and to a spike height discriminator and post-stimulus histogram system which could also be used as a counter (Spears et al, 1970). Shocks were delivered 1/sec through bipolar needles inserted in the footpads.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The signals were amplified and displayed on a CRO and an audio monitor. In addition, the signal could be sent to an averaging instrument (Mnenotron CAT 400) and to a spike height discriminator and post-stimulus histogram system which could also be used as a counter (Spears et al, 1970). Shocks were delivered 1/sec through bipolar needles inserted in the footpads.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most units were negative in polarity and had spike durations of approximately I msec, suggesting that the recordings were from nearby cell bodies rather than axons. Unit responses to successive stimulus pulses in either 7 or 20 Hz stimulus trains were quantified by a poststimulus histogram generator [18] control firing rates between different stimulation treatments were excluded from the analysis. A unit response was defined as a statistically significant (X 2 , p<0.05) difference in firing rate between the poststimulus and control periods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%