2015
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2015.2443551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Pulse Compression Waveform for Weather Radars With Solid-State Transmitters

Abstract: Due to the contradiction between the high sensitivity requirement and low transmission power of weather radars with solid-state transmitters, a pulse compression technique is necessary. For the purpose of range sidelobe suppression, methods based on amplitude modulation and a mismatched filter are commonly used for target detection radars, which are not applicable for weather observations because of its drawbacks such as main lobe expansion and power loss. This letter presents a nonlinear frequency modulation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen from the figure that both algorithms can suppress the side-lobes to almost zero in a specified lag interval. The PCL and I of the sequences designed by the two algorithms are about −100 dB, which is low enough for the applications of simultaneous polarimetric radar [28]. The main difference between the two algorithms is the consumed time.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen from the figure that both algorithms can suppress the side-lobes to almost zero in a specified lag interval. The PCL and I of the sequences designed by the two algorithms are about −100 dB, which is low enough for the applications of simultaneous polarimetric radar [28]. The main difference between the two algorithms is the consumed time.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain the impulse response with low sidelobes, amplitude weighting by a selected window function during pulse compression is usually applied, which will make the spectrum shape of the LFM signal similar with taper weighting as shown in on the left side of Figure 1. Since window weighting changes the spectrum shape of the LFM signal and noise, according to the principle of the matched filter, the output SNR after pulse compression is not the maximum value, and window weighting results in the SNR loss in focused SAR images [3,21]. An improved method to obtain the tapering shape spectrum for the impulse response with low sidelobes is to generate the non-uniform discrete frequency distribution as shown in the middle part of Figure 1.…”
Section: Nlfm Signal and Azimuth Non-uniform Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , P/2 − 1 (21) where ∆t a ≤ 1/B total indicates the azimuth time sampling interval after upsampling in azimuth pre-filtering, B total is the total Doppler bandwidth of the imaged scene, and P is the number of azimuth samples after upsampling. In order to efficiently apply FFT to implement azimuth convolution between the SAR raw data and the selected chirp signal, P should be [30]:…”
Section: Modified Stolt Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A window function is often utilized to suppress range sidelobes, resulting in the expansion of the main lobe and the loss of the signal to noise ratio (SNR) [4,5]. However, the reflectivity of precipitations ranges from about −10 to 75 dBZ [6,7] and the radar sensitivity is one of the most critical factors for distributed precipitations in weather observations. Therefore, in order to reduce the SNR loss of LFM signal after windowing, the NLFM waveform was developed decades ago.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%