A public-key based secure mobile IP

Zao, John K.; Kent, Stephen; Gahm, Joshua; Troxel, Gregory D.; Condell, Matthew; Helinek, Pam; Yuan, Nina; Castineyra, I.

doi:10.1145/262116.262145

Cited by 25 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[2], [9] None None MAC (Static key) Protocol in [10] Symmetric encryption Symmetric encryption Symmetric encryption Protocol in [11] None Certified public key Certified public key Protocol in [13] None None Symmetric encryption Lam [15] None None Digital Signature Protocol in [16] None None MAC Protocol in [17] Digital Signature Digital Signature Digital Signature Protocol in [18] IPSec Tunnelling Tunnelling with firewall IPSec Tunnelling Protocol in [19] Certificate from CA Certificate from CA Certificate from CA Yang [23] None Digital Signature Symmetric encryption Protocol in [24] Signature Signature Signature Protocol in [27] PKI Certificate & MAC PKI Certificate & MAC PKI Certificate &MAC Protocols in [28], [29] HMAC HMAC HMAC Protocols in [31], [33] None MAC (static/dynamic key) MAC (dynamic key) Protocol in [47] None Digital Signature MAC (dynamic key) Protocol in [50] Certificate Certificate Certificate Protocol in [51] TTP MAC (static/dynamic key) MAC (dynamic key) Protocol in [52] None MAC (static/dynamic key) MAC (dynamic key) ID Based [71] None IBS without pairings MAC (dynamic key) ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ …”

Section: International Journal Of Computer Applications (0975 -8887) mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Replay attack prevention Location privacy ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Base protocol [2], [9] None None Protocol in [11] Yes (Nonce) None Protocol in [12] None None Protocol in [13] Yes (Secret key & Timestamp) None Protocol in [14] Yes (Timestamp or Nonce) Yes (Identification number) Protocol in [17] Yes (Nonce) None Protocol in [21] Yes (Timestamp) None Protocol in [24] Yes (Identity) None Protocol in [40] Yes (Nonces) Yes (TID) Protocol in [47] Yes (Nonce) None Protocol in [48] Yes (ID-Based Secure Session key) None Protocols in [53], [61] Yes (Nonces) Yes (TID & Hash value) Protocol in [71] Yes (Temporary entries) Yes (Temporary number) Protocol in [72] Yes (Session key) Yes (Dynamic anonymity) Protocol in [75] Yes (Timestamp or Nonce) None Protocols in [76], [77] Yes (Timestamp & Nonce) Yes (TMSI & Sym.encryption) Protocol in [79] Yes (Secure key) Yes (TID) Protocol in [81] Yes ( …”

Section: Registration Protocolmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Mobile IP Registration Protocols: A Survey

KumarMathi¹,

Valarmathi²

2012

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IP Mobility which was established to facilitate mobility within a worldwide system of interconnected computer networks gives a scalable solution for different networks. As the commercial use of the internet becomes common for IP Mobility through the wireless communication, it is necessary to construct a secure IP Mobility in a registration process which informs the location of the portable systems such as mobile devices to the home network. While registering the locality with the packet transmission by the portable system, the security issues are of paramount importance and this registration must be secured against any cruel attacks that might attempt to acquire unauthorized advantages from any participating principals. The need for secure way to do Mobile IP registration has given rise to a number of protocols. This paper discusses the various existing Mobile IP Registration protocols. The simulation and comparisons has been conducted on the different protocols with the security parameters and registration time to evaluate each protocol's efficiency.

show abstract

Section: International Journal Of Computer Applications (0975 -8887) mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Registration Protocolmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mobile IP Registration Protocols: A Survey

KumarMathi¹,

Valarmathi²

2012

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A public key based secure Mobile IP was proposed by Zao et al [75] in their Mobile IP Security System (Mo-IPS) was based on a DNS based X.509 PKI and the innovation in cross certification and zero-message key generation. This proposal attempts to provide solution for alteration, masquerading and eavesdropping attacks by means of key management and cryptographic keys for authentication, access control and using secure tunneling.…”

Section: Security Approaches For Mobile Agent Attacked By the Hostmentioning

confidence: 99%

Classification and Review of Security Schemes in Mobile Computing

Kumar¹

2010

WSN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we present the classification and review of security schemes in mobile computing system. We classify these schemes based on types the infrastructure used in the mobile computing system-Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANET) and Mobile Agent model. Mobile Ad Hoc Networks are pervasive, ubiquitous and without any centralized authority. These unique characteristics, combined with ever-increasing security threats, demand solutions in securing ad hoc networks prior to their deployment in commercial and military applications. This paper reviews the prevailing mobile ad hoc network security threats, the existing solution schemes, their limitations and open research issues. We also explain the Intrusion detection and response technique as an alternate method to protect the MANET based mobile computing systems and their approaches. A literature review of important existing Intrusion Detection approaches and Intrusion Response Approaches for MANET is also presented. This paper also presents the limitations of existing Intrusion Detection and Response Approaches for MANET and open research issues in providing MANET security. With respect to Mobile Agent based mobile computing system, we have presented the classification of various types of security attacks in Mobile Agent based model and presented the security solutions for those type of attacks proposed by the various schemes and the open research issues in providing security for Mobile Agent based mobile computing system. Such classification enhances the understanding of the proposed security schemes in the mobile computing system, assists in the development and enhancement of schemes in the future and helps in choosing an appropriate scheme while implementing a mobile computing system.

show abstract

“…Currently, many MIP protocol [3][4][5] were proposed based on traditional Certificate-based Public Key Cryptology (CA-PKC), but those schemes suffered from great security cost and throughput due to inherent issue of the certificate management. Refs.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Proof of certificateless MIP registration protocol based on PCL

Zhang

Pei

2010

J. Electron.(China)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Security protocols are the basis of many mobile communication systems, thus it is important to ensure protocol property correct. Using Protocol Composition Logic (PCL), this paper proves a Mobile IP (MIP) registration protocol that is based on certificateless public key signature without pairing between home agent and foreign agent, which minimizes the registration time and cost as well as improves the security compared with the identity-based and certificate-based registration protocol. Analysis and proof shows that the proposed protocol provides users security and authentications, moreover, the anonymity property is proved correct.

show abstract

A public-key based secure mobile IP

Cited by 25 publications

References 9 publications

Mobile IP Registration Protocols: A Survey

Mobile IP Registration Protocols: A Survey

Classification and Review of Security Schemes in Mobile Computing

Proof of certificateless MIP registration protocol based on PCL

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About