2016
DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2162v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A public data set of human balance evaluations

Abstract: The goal of this study was to create a public data set with results of qualitative and quantitative evaluations related to human balance. Subject's balance was evaluated by posturography using a force platform and by the Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Tests. In the posturography test, we evaluated subjects during standing still for 60 s in four different conditions where vision and the standing surface were manipulated: on a rigid surface with eyes open; on a rigid surface with eyes closed; on an unstable sur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study uses a previously recorded dataset, in which COP data is collected of 163 participants (Santos & Duarte, 2016a, 2016b, published open access on physionet.org (Goldberger et al, 2000). Ethical approval for collating this dataset was provided by the local ethics committee of the Federal University of ABC (#842529/ 2014) (Santos & Duarte, 2016a, 2016b. The dataset contains information from 116 females and 47 males, with an age between 18 and 86 years.…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This study uses a previously recorded dataset, in which COP data is collected of 163 participants (Santos & Duarte, 2016a, 2016b, published open access on physionet.org (Goldberger et al, 2000). Ethical approval for collating this dataset was provided by the local ethics committee of the Federal University of ABC (#842529/ 2014) (Santos & Duarte, 2016a, 2016b. The dataset contains information from 116 females and 47 males, with an age between 18 and 86 years.…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum score is 28 points and a score lower than 19.5 indicates an elevated fall risk (Marques et al, 2016). For the full protocol, please see (Santos & Duarte, 2016b).…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The aim of this study is to demonstrate an effective feature selection procedure that can allow for more accurate and reliable classification of fall-risk among older subjects using static force-platform measures only. This study will avail of an opensource dataset (https://peerj.com/articles/2648) which has been published specifically for use in such studies (31). A combination of Support vector machines-Recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE), a Genetic algorithm (GA) and ReliefF feature selection methods will be utilized to find the most relevant, least redundant subset and Singha & Shenoy's (6) self-evaluating feature evaluation (SAFE) heuristic will optimize complementarity downstream from this.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the final feature subset will then be tested using a Multi-layer perceptron (MLP), Support vector machines (SVM), Naïve Bayes (NB) and K-Nearest neighbours (K-NN). A full description of the data acquisition protocol can be found at (31). Only the most relevant aspects to this study will be covered here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%