A psychoanalytic probe into Academic Othering of the United States: Defenses of splitting and projection, consequences, and alternatives through emotion work

Abstract

For this Special Paper Series of Organization, I work with a psychoanalytic perspective to scrutinize organizing processes as critical academics—specifically, unconscious dynamics of responding to US-based social crises. I contend that it is not feasible to organize effectively against the violent hate of right-wing populist movements sustained by Othering without commitment to confronting academics’ individual and collective Othering and defensive processes. These defenses include splitting and projecting onto convenient Others, which can serve performative gratifications. Through analysis of critical academic declarations in 2017, I analyze Academic Othering of the United States. Splitting the United States off as the ‘bad’ Other of the ‘good’ United Kingdom/European Union/non-United States undermines critical analysis and potential for solidarity and relational concern. Without probing these uncomfortable dynamics, we damage opportunities as elite, privileged academics to make a difference for global struggles, and collude in exclusion. Undertaking emotion work on our academic identities to move away from the defense of splitting, and toward nuance with Klein’s depressive position, will support listening to affected voices and extending—not merely performing—concern and care.

Bursting the bubble: why sustainability initiatives often lack adequate intention to action translation

“…Our actions as a species are more likely motivated by fear, or lack of safety, than hate; which itself is a secondary emotion often resulting from fear (Shapiro, 2016;van Stekelenburg, 2017). Without keeping this in mind, we may easily fall into the fruitless and often divisive cycles of "cancel culture" and "othering" (Barak, 2019;Mueller, 2021;Ulus, 2019), which lead to further reduction of inclusion, empathy, and collaboration between siloed social groups. Those excluded may range from middle-aged white neighbors to queeridentifying individuals; in other words, a result could be the disengagement from values of benevolence and social harmony in those who wish to exude them the most (Bandura, 2002;Bandura et al, 1996).…”

Riding populist storms: Brexit, Trumpism and beyond, Special Paper Series Editorial

“…Finally, focusing on micro-level relationships within the CMS community, Ulus’ (2020) paper works with a psychoanalytical perspective to scrutinise our organising processes as critical academics – namely the unconscious dynamics of responding to the US-based social crisis surrounding Trump’s election and presidency. She argues that it is not possible to organise effectively against the effects of right-wing populism without commitment to confronting academics’ individual and collective othering and defensive processes.…”