2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/cec.2016.7744271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A PSO based hybrid feature selection algorithm for high-dimensional classification

Abstract: Recent research has shown that Particle Swarm Optimisation is a promising approach to feature selection. However, applying it on high-dimensional data with thousands to tens of thousands of features is still challenging because of the large search space. While filter approaches are time efficient and scalable for high-dimensional data, they usually obtain lower classification accuracy than wrapper approaches. On the other hand, wrapper methods require a longer running time than filter methods due to the learni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, the proposed approach underperforms for -11 Tumors‖ datasets with merely 0.33% difference in terms of accuracy. Additionally, the proposed approach is 5-8 times faster than the approach suggested by authors [20,25].…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Conversely, the proposed approach underperforms for -11 Tumors‖ datasets with merely 0.33% difference in terms of accuracy. Additionally, the proposed approach is 5-8 times faster than the approach suggested by authors [20,25].…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Best results obtained in proposed work are compared with the best results of some existing work as shown in Table 5. As seen in Table 5 that the proposed approach selects the minimum number of features as compared to the methods proposed by authors [20,25]. TC-BPSO not only selects the minimum number of features but also improves the classification accuracy.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the evaluation criteria, feature selection algorithms are generally classified into two categories: 1) filter approaches and 2) wrapper approaches [Ambusaidi, He, Nanda et al (2016); Zawbaa, Emary, Hassanien et al (2016)]. Their main difference is that wrapper approaches include a classification/learning algorithm in feature subset evaluation, while filter algorithms are independent of any classification algorithms [Tran, Zhang and Xue (2016)]. Filters ignore the performance of the selected features, whereas wrappers not, which usually results in those wrappers getting better solutions [Yang, Liu, Zhou et al (2013)].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To verify the performance of the proposed BBPSO-ACJ, the following 8 EC based wrappers are employed: Genetic algorithm (GA) 40 , PSO 31 , Binary PSO (BPSO) 30 ,Binary PSO with chaotic inertia weight (BPSO-CI) 35 , BBPSO 23 , Quantum inspired PSO (QBPSO) 41 , Binary PSO with catfish effect (BPSO-CE) 15 , PSO (4-2) 18 . Furthermore, two filter based methods, linear forward selection (LFS) and greedy stepwise based selection (GSBS), are also employed for comparison.…”
Section: Comparative Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%