2016
DOI: 10.1137/151004252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Pseudo-Markov Property for Controlled Diffusion Processes

Abstract: In this note, we propose two different approaches to rigorously justify a pseudoMarkov property for controlled diffusion processes which is often (explicitly or implicitly) used to prove the dynamic programming principle in the stochastic control literature. The first approach develops a sketch of proof proposed by Fleming and Souganidis [9]. The second approach is based on an enlargement of the original state space and a controlled martingale problem. We clarify some measurability and topological issues raise… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…H k s dB s is of full measure under Pω for P−almost everyω ∈ Ω, and hence by the tower property P(A k ) = 1 for all k = 0, · · · , n (we also refer to [12] for some some discussion on the measurability of A k under Pω). This yields that…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 24 (Ii) Under Assumption 23 (Iii)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H k s dB s is of full measure under Pω for P−almost everyω ∈ Ω, and hence by the tower property P(A k ) = 1 for all k = 0, · · · , n (we also refer to [12] for some some discussion on the measurability of A k under Pω). This yields that…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 24 (Ii) Under Assumption 23 (Iii)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence of the flow property in Lemma 3.1, we obtain the following conditioning lemma, also called pseudo-Markov property in the terminology of [20], for the controlled conditional distribution F 0 -progressive process {ρ…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In case of (1.7), the driving state is a CNM-SDE-BM and the lack of Markov property is due to non-anticipative functionals α and σ which may depend on the whole path of X u . In this case, the controlled state X u satisfies a pseudo-Markov property in the sense of [10]. The theory developed in this article applies to case (1.7) without requiring ellipticity conditions on the diffusion component σ.…”
Section: Andmentioning
confidence: 99%