2010
DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679.1223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Pseudo-EM Algorithm for Clustering Incomplete Longitudinal Data

Abstract: A method for clustering incomplete longitudinal data, and gene expression time course data in particular, is presented. Specifically, an existing method that utilizes mixtures of multivariate Gaussian distributions with modified Cholesky-decomposed covariance structure is extended to accommodate incomplete data. Parameter estimation is carried out in a fashion that is similar to an expectation-maximization algorithm. We focus on the particular application of clustering incomplete gene expression time course da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shaikh et al [16] applied the clustering method based on the model to cluster the missing vertical data. They used the mixed normal distribution and improved the Cholesky method for decomposing the covariance structure and then used the EM algorithm to estimate the parameters of the method model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shaikh et al [16] applied the clustering method based on the model to cluster the missing vertical data. They used the mixed normal distribution and improved the Cholesky method for decomposing the covariance structure and then used the EM algorithm to estimate the parameters of the method model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is implemented in software [89]. McNicholas [90] further extends the task of clustering longitudinal data with missing observations. Eigen-decomposition is another common type of decomposition of covariance matrix [10], [11] and obviously leads to different types of constraints of new matrices.…”
Section: Introduction To Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%