2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2010.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A provision-aware fair bandwidth distribution marker algorithm for DiffServ networks

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThe rise in demand for real-time applications on the Internet necessitates Quality of Service (QoS). Differentiated Services (DiffServ) is one of the technologies used currently to provide QoS and service differentiation. It is simple and scalable. It provides service differentiation to aggregates, mainly through the Assured Forwarding (AF) per-hop behaviour. Previous work on fair sharing of network bandwidth did not adequately address the Under-Provisioned Network (UPN) condition. In this paper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis also showed the fairness behaviour of the proposed marker algorithm to be between the simulation and analytical marking probability. The simulation results verified that the fairness behaviour of the new marker algorithm was related with the other algorithms, such as the ItswTCM [33], I 2 tswTCM [34], MI 2 tswTCM [39], M 2 I 2 tswTCM [2], PaItswTCM [40] and PAPTCM [29] by verifying the CIR for the aggregate. In aggregate 1, the CIR was a constant value at 1 Mbps but the value increased from 1 to 14 Mbps in aggregate 2.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The analysis also showed the fairness behaviour of the proposed marker algorithm to be between the simulation and analytical marking probability. The simulation results verified that the fairness behaviour of the new marker algorithm was related with the other algorithms, such as the ItswTCM [33], I 2 tswTCM [34], MI 2 tswTCM [39], M 2 I 2 tswTCM [2], PaItswTCM [40] and PAPTCM [29] by verifying the CIR for the aggregate. In aggregate 1, the CIR was a constant value at 1 Mbps but the value increased from 1 to 14 Mbps in aggregate 2.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…To satisfy the bandwidth requirements of different priority web applications, DiffServ was proposed, which is the most important method to provide different QoS to different web applications. There are still many related work proposed recently . To provide the bandwidth guarantee to some web applications, there are also many proposed schemes: some early works such as the famous RSVP and PCP and some present works such as the schemes in and ESnet .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%