A Provably Secure and Lightweight Identity-Based Two-Party Authenticated Key Agreement Protocol for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks

Li, Quanrun; Hsu, Ching-Fang; Choo, Kim‐Kwang Raymond; He, Debiao

doi:10.1155/2019/7871067

Cited by 24 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In order to mitigate the certificate management problem, many identity-based schemes were proposed such as [16][17][18][19][20][21]. Zhang et al [16] introduced an identity-based solution with batch verification called IBV.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Improved and Privacy-Preserving Mutual Authentication Scheme with Forward Secrecy in VANETs

Yao

Wang

Gan

et al. 2021

Security and Communication Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vehicular ad hoc network (VANETs) plays a major part in intelligent transportation to enhance traffic efficiency and safety. Security and privacy are the essential matters needed to be tackled due to the open communication channel. Most of the existing schemes only provide message authentication without identity authentication, especially the inability to support forward secrecy which is a major security goal of authentication schemes. In this article, we propose a privacy-preserving mutual authentication scheme with batch verification for VANETs which support both message authentication and identity authentication. More importantly, the proposed scheme achieves forward secrecy, which means the exposure of the shared key will not compromise the previous interaction. The security proof shows that our scheme can withstand various known security attacks, such as the impersonation attack and forgery attack. The experiment analysis results based on communication and computation cost demonstrate that our scheme is more efficient compared with the related schemes.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Improved and Privacy-Preserving Mutual Authentication Scheme with Forward Secrecy in VANETs

Yao

Wang

Gan

et al. 2021

Security and Communication Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, if private key is not stored in , the adversary cannot compromise that node. Thus, the proposed protocol is secure against device compromise attack, while [6,7,8,9] are insecure against that. and , he can only gain access to the temporary, not permanent, IDs.…”

Section: Informal Security Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We analyzed protocols by Alzarani et al [6], Chaudhry et al [10], and Li et al [9] in terms of security issues. Then, we proposed a mutual key-agreement protocol that includes four phases: (i) initialization, (ii) registration and long secret key generation, (iii) authentication and key agreement, (iv) public and private keys updating.…”

Section: Contributionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Table 1 has provided explanations for previous methods and features. In this article, we analyze the protocols by Alzahrani et al [6], Li et al [9], and Chaudhry et al [10] to demonstrate their security deficiencies. Our proposed protocol features an acceptable computational and communication overhead which, considering the real-time nature of D2D systems and resource scarcity, greatly improves performance.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this article, we demonstrate that the protocol proposed by Alzahrani et al [6] suffers from some problems in design and is insecure against insider attacks, key compromise attack, and fails to provide anonymity. On the other hand, the proposed protocol by Li et al [9] for D2D-based communication is elaborated here and is shown to be vulnerable against key compromise attack and replay attack. Furthermore, it does not support anonymity and untraceability.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Secure Anonymous D2D Mutual Authentication and Key Agreement Protocol for IoT Environments

Hajian

Haghighat

Erfani

2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Internet of Things (IoT) is a developing technology in our time that is prone to security problems as it uses wireless and shared networks. A challenging scenario in IoT environments is Device-to-Device (D2D) communication that an authentication server as a trusted third-party, does not involve in the authentication and key agreement process. It is only involved in the process of allocating long-term secret keys and their update. A lot of authentication protocols have been suggested for such situations. This article demonstrated that three state-of-the-art related protocols failed to remain anonymous, insecure against key compromise impersonation (KCI) attack, and clogging attack. To counter the pitfalls of them, a new D2D mutual authentication and key agreement protocol is designed here. The proposed protocol is anonymous, untraceable, and highly secure. Moreover, there is no need for a secure channel to generate a pair of private and public keys in the registration phase.) Formal security proof and security analysis using BAN logic, Real-Or-Random (ROR) model, and Scyther tool showed that our proposed protocol satisfied security requirements. Furthermore, communication cost, computation cost, and energy consumption comparisons denoted our schema has better performance, compared to other protocols.

show abstract

SiSMA‐SWMS: Signature‐based Secure Monitoring Approach for Smart Waste Monitoring Systems

Lama,

Karmakar

2024

Security and Privacy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the speedy growth of the populace, corresponding waste also grows, notably raising greater concern about the monitoring of waste in urban areas. Although the traditional method of waste monitoring has benefited city waste management systems, it remains time‐consuming, inefficient, and detrimental to public health. This situation can be improved by integrating advanced technologies, which can significantly enhance the flexibility and performance of waste monitoring systems. However, these advanced technologies encounter numerous security challenges. In this article, we have implemented a signature‐based monitoring approach to oversee the status of smart bins. To ensure the security, robustness, and reliability of the introduced protocol, we utilized tools such as AVISPA, Scyther, the ROR model, and Mao and Boyd logic. As discussed in the informal security analysis, the introduced protocol successfully fulfills the security requirements for smart waste monitoring systems. Finally, an in‐depth comparative analysis of the related works and the introduced protocol shows that the latter provides greater security, reliability, and efficiency. As a result, the reliability and hardness of the cryptographic operations used in the introduced protocol make it secure enough to use in real‐world applications.

show abstract

A Provably Secure and Lightweight Identity-Based Two-Party Authenticated Key Agreement Protocol for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks

Cited by 24 publications

References 27 publications

An Improved and Privacy-Preserving Mutual Authentication Scheme with Forward Secrecy in VANETs

An Improved and Privacy-Preserving Mutual Authentication Scheme with Forward Secrecy in VANETs

A Secure Anonymous D2D Mutual Authentication and Key Agreement Protocol for IoT Environments

SiSMA‐SWMS: Signature‐based Secure Monitoring Approach for Smart Waste Monitoring Systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About