2020
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2020.2965546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Proton Sensor for Energies From 2 to 20 MeV

Abstract: CNES and ONERA have developed a radiation monitor ICARE-NG (Influence sur les Composants Avancés des Radiations de l'Espace-Nouvelle Génération) to measure protons and electrons in radiation belts. This instrument is able to measure a wide range of energy for protons and electrons, but no measurements of few MeV protons are performed. The objective of this study is to extend capabilities of this radiation monitor by adding a low-energy proton sensor. In this article the design of a sensor for low-energy proton… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the numerical simulation presents a highly idealized response of the instrument and does not consider the actual configuration of the instrument. Because the Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate the detector response is CPU‐intensive, the simulation is often undertaken for a simplified instrument residing isolated within a hypothetical domain (Baker et al., 2014; Khoo et al., 2022; Park et al., 2021; Rodríguez‐Pacheco et al., 2020; Ruffenach et al., 2020; Seon et al., 2020; Siegl et al., 2009; Spence et al., 2010; Yando et al., 2011). This simplification of instrument configuration may lead to inaccurate estimation of geometric factors, especially when there are heavy shadowing effects of charged particle fluxes owing to the presence of a spacecraft platform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the numerical simulation presents a highly idealized response of the instrument and does not consider the actual configuration of the instrument. Because the Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate the detector response is CPU‐intensive, the simulation is often undertaken for a simplified instrument residing isolated within a hypothetical domain (Baker et al., 2014; Khoo et al., 2022; Park et al., 2021; Rodríguez‐Pacheco et al., 2020; Ruffenach et al., 2020; Seon et al., 2020; Siegl et al., 2009; Spence et al., 2010; Yando et al., 2011). This simplification of instrument configuration may lead to inaccurate estimation of geometric factors, especially when there are heavy shadowing effects of charged particle fluxes owing to the presence of a spacecraft platform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of ionizing radiation on space electronics, satellites and solar cells has long been a concern, and protons are a major constituent in galactic cosmic rays, trapped particles in the van Allen belts and solar particle events [6][7][8][9][10]. A variety of radiation detectors have been introduced over the years [4,5,11,12], which can be mainly categorized into active and passive devices. Active radiation detectors provide real time results whereas the passive detectors must be processed and analyzed later to obtain the results, but they are easy to handle, cheaper and lighter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%