“…As the number of complexes between DNA and minor groove binding ligands that have been solved by X-ray crystallography (Kopka et al, 1985;Coll et al, 1989;Brown et al, 1990Brown et al, , 1992Gao et al, 1993;Tabernero et al, 1993;Nunn et al, 1994;Goodsell et al, 1995) and NMR (Klevit et al, 1986;Patel & Shapiro, 1986;Lee et al, 1988;Pelton & Wemmer, 1989;Kumar et al, 1990Kumar et al, , 1991Parkinson et al, 1990;Searle & Embrey, 1990;Fede et al, 1991;Singh et al, 1992;Jenkins et al, 1993;Sriram et al, 1994) increases, it is becoming possible to identify structural considerations that govern observed patterns of sequence selectivity and affinity. Some of these factors are relatively self-evident, such as the requirement for overall shape complementarity between the ligand and the minor groove surface (isohelicity) (Goodsell & Dickerson, 1986) and for complementarity in hydrogen-bonding and electrostatic characteristics (Zakrzewska et al, 1987) between the ligand and a DNA binding site.…”