2015
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1399800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Protocol to Reduce Interobserver Variability in the Computed Tomography Measurement of Orbital Floor Fractures

Abstract: Orbital fracture detection and size determination from computed tomography (CT) scans affect the decision to operate, the type of surgical implant used, and postoperative outcomes. However, the lack of standardization of radiological signs often leads to the false-positive detection of orbital fractures, while nonstandardized landmarks lead to inaccurate defect measurements. We aim to design a novel protocol for CT measurement of orbital floor fractures and evaluate the interobserver variability on CT scan ima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome problems of manual estimations, various software have been proposed. Compared with previous studies done using computational analysis for calculating fracture area, 1,15,20,21 our results show a similar variability. However, most of the aforementioned analysis methods require on the user pointing to several margin points along the fracture margins and are thus somewhat laborious.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…To overcome problems of manual estimations, various software have been proposed. Compared with previous studies done using computational analysis for calculating fracture area, 1,15,20,21 our results show a similar variability. However, most of the aforementioned analysis methods require on the user pointing to several margin points along the fracture margins and are thus somewhat laborious.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Measurement of the fracture size was performed based from Ang et al (2015) [ 25 ]. The measurement started at the coronal view of the scan.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…retrospectively created two treatment plans (one before and one after RA integration) for each patient. Aiming for a standardized planning method to reduce inter-and intraobserver variabilities, 1,39,41 we used the following protocols during dose planning; 1) the radiosurgical target should be determined by meticulously comparing images acquired using a variety of imaging studies; 2) each shot should be placed inside the radiosurgical target; 3) if possible, feeders and drainers should be excluded from the radiosurgical target; 4) if it is difficult to judge whether a vessel belongs to a nidus, feeder, or drainer, trace the vessel both downstream and upstream and determine where it belongs; 5) radiosurgical doses should be prescribed with a 50% ± 5% isodose line; and 6) the gamma angle should be fixed at 90°.…”
Section: Radiosurgical Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we could not fully incorporate these variabilities, we did at least partially address them by using the standardized contouring protocol and allowing the physicians to use multimodal imaging. 1,39,41 FIG. 3.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%