2019
DOI: 10.3390/rs11161913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Protocol for Aerial Survey in Coastal Areas Using UAS

Abstract: Aerial surveys in coastal areas using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) present many limitations. However, the need for detailed and accurate information in a marine environment has made UAVs very popular. The aim of this paper is to present a protocol which summarizes the parameters that affect the reliability of the data acquisition process over the marine environment using Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS). The proposed UAS Data Acquisition Protocol consists of three main categories: (i) Morphology of the study a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Aerial observations and in situ measurements of the Kodor plume were conducted on 1-2 September 2018 and 1-3 April 2019, while aerial observations and in situ measurements of the Bzyp plume were performed on 31 May-1 June 2019. Below we provide the protocols of these aerial surveys according to the scheme suggested by Doukari et al [74].…”
Section: Aerial In Situ and Satellite Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aerial observations and in situ measurements of the Kodor plume were conducted on 1-2 September 2018 and 1-3 April 2019, while aerial observations and in situ measurements of the Bzyp plume were performed on 31 May-1 June 2019. Below we provide the protocols of these aerial surveys according to the scheme suggested by Doukari et al [74].…”
Section: Aerial In Situ and Satellite Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These anomalies appeared due to different illumination conditions and the sun glint; therefore, the multispectral orthomosaic classification presents lower accuracy values. It is crucial to follow a specific UAS flight protocol before each data acquisition, as presented by Doukari et al in [29,43], for eliminating these anomalies. It should be mentioned that the UAS data acquisition procedure works fine over land, presenting a high accuracy level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data acquisition took place on the 8 th July 2018 in the Pamfila area. Before the data acquisition, the UAS toolbox was used to predict the optimal flight time [29]. The toolbox automates a protocol, which summarizes the parameters that affect the reliability and the quality of the data acquisition process over the marine environment using UAS.…”
Section: Flight Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The randomisation of survey direction to reduce bias in sampling created issues with glare, as glare can be minimised by keeping the sun orientated behind the aircraft (Kay, Hedley, & Lavender, 2009). By surveying on overcast days and considering sun angles glare can be reduced (Doukari, Batsaris, Papakonstantinou, & Topouzelis, 2019; Joyce, Duce, Leahy, Leon, & Maier, 2019), but this may limit the utility of drones when survey methods involve using randomised direction. The spacing of the ground stations was fortuitous in this study, but the lack of appropriate operational areas may also limit the utility of drones in other areas, in addition to restricted airspace.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%