Background:The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of zoledronic
acid (ZA) plus intravenous methylprednisolone (VOLT01) to ZA, and placebo
for knee osteoarthritis.Methods:A single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) was carried
out. Adults (aged ⩾50 years) with knee osteoarthritis, significant knee pain
[⩾40 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS)], and magnetic resonance
imaging-detected bone marrow lesion (BML) were randomized to receive a
one-off administration of VOLT01, ZA, or placebo. The primary hypothesis was
that VOLT01 was superior to ZA in having a lower incidence of acute phase
responses (APRs) over 3 days. Secondary hypotheses were that VOLT01 was
noninferior to ZA, and both treatments were superior to placebo in
decreasing BML size over 6 months and in improving knee pain [Western
Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and VAS] and
function (WOMAC) over 3 and 6 months.Results:A total of 117 patients (62.2 ± 8.1 years, 63 women) were enrolled. The
incidence of APRs was similar in the VOLT01 (90%) and ZA (87%) groups
(p = 0.74). VOLT01 was superior to ZA in improving knee
pain and function after 6 months and noninferior to ZA in reducing BML size.
However, BML size change was small in all groups and there were no
between-group differences. Compared with placebo, VOLT01 but not ZA improved
knee function and showed a trend toward improving knee pain after
6 months.Conclusions:Administering intravenous methylprednisolone with ZA did not reduce APRs or
change knee BML size over 6 months, but in contrast to ZA or placebo, it may
have a beneficial effect on symptoms in knee osteoarthritis.Trial registration:Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12613000039785.