2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72493-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A protein-coated micro-sucker patch inspired by octopus for adhesion in wet conditions

Abstract: In medical robotics, micromanipulation becomes particularly challenging in the presence of blood and secretions. Nature offers many examples of adhesion strategies, which can be divided into two macro-categories: morphological adjustments and chemical adaptations. This paper analyzes how two successful specializations from different marine animals can converge into a single biomedical device usable in moist environments. Taking inspiration from the morphology of the octopus sucker and the chemistry of mussel s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, as suggested by results in Figures 5 and 6, the use of a composite materials that consists of a nonstretchable backing (i.e., fabric or a thin layer of stiff elastomer) covered with a soft elastomer has a potential to further improve both suction force and adaptability on a broad range of rough surfaces. Also, the soft robotic architecture of the proposed SSG can easily be combined with various functional interfaces developed in previous works, such as electrostatically adhesive surfaces, [6,7,45] crack trapping surfaces, [46,47] and microsuction surfaces, [48,49] to produce better performance in achieving robust and strong suction. Furthermore, characterization in gripping performance under various dynamic loading conditions will be an interesting topic, as a fast pulling speed can either reduce or increase the gripper's payload capacity by inertia of the object or viscoelasticity of the gripper body.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, as suggested by results in Figures 5 and 6, the use of a composite materials that consists of a nonstretchable backing (i.e., fabric or a thin layer of stiff elastomer) covered with a soft elastomer has a potential to further improve both suction force and adaptability on a broad range of rough surfaces. Also, the soft robotic architecture of the proposed SSG can easily be combined with various functional interfaces developed in previous works, such as electrostatically adhesive surfaces, [6,7,45] crack trapping surfaces, [46,47] and microsuction surfaces, [48,49] to produce better performance in achieving robust and strong suction. Furthermore, characterization in gripping performance under various dynamic loading conditions will be an interesting topic, as a fast pulling speed can either reduce or increase the gripper's payload capacity by inertia of the object or viscoelasticity of the gripper body.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their performance against rough substrates were not reported so far. [ 23–25 ] Therefore, the mechanism of large cavity deformation and its role in adhesion to rough substrates remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[117] In this regard, several bioinspired solutions came from the study of the abilities and characteristics of cephalopods. In Figure 2b-i,ii we report some example of octopuses' bioinspired soft grippers, [118,119] that exploit the flexibility of the soft material and the integration of suction cup elements [120][121][122][123][124] to firmly grasp objects in confined, constrained, [53] or open environments. [125] In such examples, bioinspiration allows to solve some critical issues, such as coiling without damaging the organic or inorganic support [60,126] (Figure 2c), not interfering with the surrounding ecological environment, [127] or avoiding obstacles in simulated rescue situations [128,129] (Figure 2d).…”
Section: Bioinspired Soft Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%