2015
DOI: 10.1177/102490791502200302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Prospective Validation of National Early Warning Score in Emergency Intensive Care Unit Patients at Beijing

Abstract: Introduction National Early Warning Score (NEWS) was launched in 2012 by the Royal College of Physicians in UK with an aim to improve the assessment of critical patients and timely detection of clinical deterioration. Objective To assess the performance of NEWS in emergency intensive care unit (EICU) patients in Beijing, PROC. Design prospective cohort study. Setting EICU in a university hospital. Methods The inclusion criteria were patients who stayed in the EICU beds under Department of Emergency Med… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NEWS is a validated clinical assessment tool developed by the Royal College of Physicians in the United Kingdom ( 9 – 11 ). NEWS comprises respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, temperature, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and level of consciousness (Supplementary Table 1, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/CCM/F704 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NEWS is a validated clinical assessment tool developed by the Royal College of Physicians in the United Kingdom ( 9 – 11 ). NEWS comprises respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, temperature, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and level of consciousness (Supplementary Table 1, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/CCM/F704 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The single effectiveness study was rated as having high ROB [ 28 ]. Eight studies that developed and validated a system (in the same sample) were rated as having low ( n = 6) [ 29 – 34 ] and unclear (n = 2) [ 35 , 36 ] ROB. The 28 studies that validated an existing system in a new cohort were judged as having an overall low ( n = 16) [ 37 – 52 ], unclear ( n = 9) [ 18 , 53 – 60 ] and high ROB ( n = 3) [ 61 – 63 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 28 studies that validated an existing system in a new cohort were judged as having an overall low ( n = 16) [ 37 – 52 ], unclear ( n = 9) [ 18 , 53 – 60 ] and high ROB ( n = 3) [ 61 – 63 ]. The domains of selection bias and factor measurement were most commonly rated as unclear ROB because they did not specify the methods of sampling ( n = 10) [ 18 , 36 38 , 47 , 48 , 54 , 58 – 60 ] or did not state cut-off values used ( n = 12) [ 31 , 33 – 35 , 42 , 46 , 49 , 57 , 58 , 60 , 61 , 63 ]. One study also did not pre-specify the outcomes clearly [ 59 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16 of the studies performed an internal validation, where a proportion of the entire study dataset was used to develop the EWS (training set), with the remaining proportion was used for validation (validation set) [9,11,17,18,20,22,24,28,32,34,35,38,39,41,44,46,57]. Varying proportion sizes were used for the validation set ranging from 25.0 to 100%.…”
Section: Validation Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%