2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04047-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective study on outcome of patient-specific cones in revision knee arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were no LoE I and II studies available for inclusion. The studies included one prospective LoE III, 19 and six LoE IV studies according to Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Level of Evidence. 11, 13,15,16,18,20,21 Given the overall lack of level I and II studies, a meta-analysis was not conducted.…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There were no LoE I and II studies available for inclusion. The studies included one prospective LoE III, 19 and six LoE IV studies according to Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Level of Evidence. 11, 13,15,16,18,20,21 Given the overall lack of level I and II studies, a meta-analysis was not conducted.…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean follow-up was 24.2 months (range, 14-30 months). Six studies reported on the gender of the patients (543 patients) 11,13,15,16,19,20 including 298 females (54.9%) and 223 males (45.1%). Three studies (212 knees) reported on the mean number of surgical procedures before index revision 11,13,21 with a mean number of 2.5 (range, 1-4.2 procedures).…”
Section: Demographic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Arthroplasty is an effective treatment for arthropathy, as it can relieve pain, restore physical activities, and improve the quality of life of patients. In prosthetic surgeries involving malignant bone tumors [ 1 ], revision arthroplasty [ 2 , 3 ], periprosthetic fractures, failed osteosynthesis [ 4 ], and infections, firm attachment between the tendon and the metal prosthesis is necessary to enhance motor function [ 5 , 6 ]. However, this challenge has not been solved because tendon tissue has poor vascularity and healing ability [ 7 , 8 ], and the biocompatibility of prostheses for tissue integration is generally poor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%