2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01873.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of non-surgical root canal treatment: part 2: tooth survival

Abstract: The 4-year tooth survival following primary or secondary root canal treatment was 95%, with thirteen prognostic factors common to both.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

14
295
1
14

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 323 publications
(324 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
14
295
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have demonstrated unexpected anatomical variables and complexities in maxillary incisors [14], as well as in maxillary and mandibular premolars [15]. Furthermore, the maxillary premolars are more susceptible to vertical root fracture [16]. These conditions can help to explain the higher incidence of failure of endodontic treatment in these teeth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies have demonstrated unexpected anatomical variables and complexities in maxillary incisors [14], as well as in maxillary and mandibular premolars [15]. Furthermore, the maxillary premolars are more susceptible to vertical root fracture [16]. These conditions can help to explain the higher incidence of failure of endodontic treatment in these teeth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epidemiological studies have shown a higher percentage of failure [20,21] when the root canal therapy is performed by general clinicians, when compared to treatments that were performed by specialists, which have a success rate of up to 94% [2]. Moreover, the quality of coronal restorations can also contribute to failure of endodontic therapy [16], which is in accordance with the findings of the present study, where the failure or fracture of coronal restoration retained by composite resin, amalgam, prosthetic crown, or provisional material represented a significant percentage of cases that were indicated for new root canal treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Significant post-operative restorative factors included presence of cast restoration versus temporary restoration presence of cast post and core, proximal contacts with both mesial and distal adjacent teeth and terminal location of the tooth. [7] Traditionally, three aspects are associated in the analysis of RCT success -the clinical, radiographic and microscopic characteristics. In the clinical context, two of these aspects normally guide the decision-making process: clinical history (symptoms -absence; sensitivity, discomfort and/or pain; physical exam -normality; edema, fistula, excessive mobility) and interpretation of images (signs of periapical health; periapical bone radiolucency ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presumably, in a significant number of cases it also results in failure of RCT by possible miss of the root canal, by perforation, or even instrument separation, whereas reliable epidemiological data on this presumption are not available [7]. A supposable reason for the lack of this knowledge is, that most studies investigating failures of RCT or reasons for tooth extraction do not look at this eventually impairing parameter [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%