2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12055-017-0617-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective study of risk factors associated with persistent pleural effusion after total cavopulmonary connection with special reference to serum cortisol level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data added further evidence to support this opinion by showing that prolonged mechanical ventilation could heighten the risk of PPE and extend length of hospital stay in patients after TCPC surgery. One of the possible explanations behind this finding is that a rise in intra-thoracic pressure and central venous pressure, which is produced by mechanical ventilation, could lead to a decline in lymphatic drainage and reabsorption of pleural fluid (19). In addition, patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation usually require more fluid intake, which might aggravate the PPE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data added further evidence to support this opinion by showing that prolonged mechanical ventilation could heighten the risk of PPE and extend length of hospital stay in patients after TCPC surgery. One of the possible explanations behind this finding is that a rise in intra-thoracic pressure and central venous pressure, which is produced by mechanical ventilation, could lead to a decline in lymphatic drainage and reabsorption of pleural fluid (19). In addition, patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation usually require more fluid intake, which might aggravate the PPE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, as has been discussed in our prior publication 19 and the results in another larger series, 20 the sample size was calculated to demonstrate the difference in the two groups (with or without fenestration) to be statistically significant in a two‐sided test with 5% alpha error and 80% power. This was based on a prior publication from our institute 19 using the formula 2true(S12+S22true)(Z1α+Z1β)2/(X1X2)2swhere S 1 = standard deviation of the group without fenestration as 4.9, S 2 = standard deviation of the group with fenestration considered as 6.1, X 1 = mean drain output without fenestration considered as 20 mL/kg/d, X 2 = mean drain output with fenestration as 14.7 mL/kg/d, Z 1− α = 5%(1.96), and Z 1− β = 80% power (0.84). Therefore, the sample size was calculated by taking by taking an average in two different studies 19,20 in which all information required such as SD and mean are not described in detail.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that significant pleural effusion is defined as drainage more than 20 mL/kg/d or if it persisted for more than 2 weeks. 19,20 This was the basis for the calculation of sample size in this study.…”
Section: Sample Size Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations