2010
DOI: 10.1111/igc.0b013e3181da29d0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Prospective Study of Postoperative Lymphedema After Surgery for Cervical Cancer

Abstract: No difference in the prevalence of lymphedema was found between the CONS and RAD groups. A methodology for MFBIA for the detection of lower-limb lymphedema was described.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the literature, the incidence of LLL varied widely depending on cancer type, diagnostic criteria for lymphedema, differences in duration of followup after surgery, and surgical procedure for lymphadenectomy. LLL is estimated to affect approximately 2-44 % of patients who undergo lymphadenectomy [1,2,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the literature, the incidence of LLL varied widely depending on cancer type, diagnostic criteria for lymphedema, differences in duration of followup after surgery, and surgical procedure for lymphadenectomy. LLL is estimated to affect approximately 2-44 % of patients who undergo lymphadenectomy [1,2,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10Y12 A new, objective method, Multifrequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (MFBIA) for LLL, was recently introduced after breast cancer surgery 13,14 and after cervical cancer surgery. 15 The advantage of this method is its ability to assess body fluid compartments. It was found to have a particularly high sensitivity for lymphedema detection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retention rate for LEGS was high, with the majority of participants followed for up to two years following surgery (the maximum in the literature is to six months (39,40)). The length of followup will allow us to capture delayed development of the lymphedema, as has been documented in the breast cancer setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current work investigating lower-limb LE following gynecological cancer is restricted by self-report LE assessment, retrospective study design and/or limited follow-up period (maximum follow-up period is six months postsurgery (39,40)). Lessons learnt from the breast cancer-related LE setting clearly demonstrate that to improve understanding of secondary LE, longitudinal, cohort studies with prospective and comprehensive LE assessment (including selfreport and objective measures) and follow-up of at least 24 months post-diagnosis are needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%