2020
DOI: 10.18203/issn.2455-4510.intjresorthop20202689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective study of management of distal end of radius fracture in children

Abstract: <p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Distal end radius (DER) fractures represents one of the common fractures in the paediatric age group. Most of this injury are managed by closed reduction and casting. We investigated the degree to which the clinical and radiographic follow-ups reveal complications that lead to a change in management of the un-manipulated distal radius fractures in children less than 14 years of age. We determined the frequency and type of complications register… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no patient with unsatisfactory outcome and 3% patients developed pin site infection which was managed successfully by conservative means. 20 One of the limitations of our study was small number of cases included in this study but given the rural area where our institute is located the incidence of trauma secondary to road traffic accidents and overall traumatic injuries is less. Moreover, some of the cases were also excluded from the study as they were lost to follow up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…There was no patient with unsatisfactory outcome and 3% patients developed pin site infection which was managed successfully by conservative means. 20 One of the limitations of our study was small number of cases included in this study but given the rural area where our institute is located the incidence of trauma secondary to road traffic accidents and overall traumatic injuries is less. Moreover, some of the cases were also excluded from the study as they were lost to follow up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%