2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02468.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Prospective, Split-Face, Randomized, Comparative Study of Safety and 12-Month Longevity of Three Formulations of Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler for Treatment of Nasolabial Folds

Abstract: All three HAs provided essentially equivalent results, except for 4-week evenness results, which favored HA-1. Injection volumes of the three HAs were also similar.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
50
2
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
50
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[29] A randomized, split-face study was conducted for 12 months to assess the efficacy and safety of three HA formulations: HA-1 (Belotero Basic/Balance), HA-2 (Restylane), and HA-3 (Juvéderm Ultra 3/Juvéderm Ultra Plus XC) in the treatment of nasolabial folds. [30] Participants were randomly assigned to one of two study groups, each with twenty participants. Each participant in group 1 received HA-1 on one side and HA-2 on the other, whereas participants in group 2 received HA-1 on one side and HA-3 on the other.…”
Section: Hyaluronic Acidmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[29] A randomized, split-face study was conducted for 12 months to assess the efficacy and safety of three HA formulations: HA-1 (Belotero Basic/Balance), HA-2 (Restylane), and HA-3 (Juvéderm Ultra 3/Juvéderm Ultra Plus XC) in the treatment of nasolabial folds. [30] Participants were randomly assigned to one of two study groups, each with twenty participants. Each participant in group 1 received HA-1 on one side and HA-2 on the other, whereas participants in group 2 received HA-1 on one side and HA-3 on the other.…”
Section: Hyaluronic Acidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean pre-treatment and post-treatment nasolabial fold severity ratings did not show statistically significant differences between the groups. [30] HA is the most widely used filler yet has a relatively short duration of action, resulting in the need for constant maintenance with frequent injections for optimal treatment. [31] Recently, HA has been combined with radiofrequency (RF) devices to prolong the duration of action of HA, reducing the need for maintenance injections.…”
Section: Hyaluronic Acidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment related [79] Prospective study (n = 57), 12 months follow-up Short-term complications in 30 cases Treatment related [80] Prospective studies (n = 72), 12 months follow-up Short-term complications in 7 cases. In 2 cases migration and swelling was observed after 8 weeks Treatment related [81] Prospective studies (n = 709), 12 months follow-up…”
Section: Hyaluronic Acid (Cross-linked)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Injecté, il est très sensible à la dégradation enzymatique. Il doit être stabilisé par réticulation chimique [1].…”
unclassified
“…Il entraine une perte de volume et à l'apparition de rides. Les produits de comblement injectables ont supplanté les techniques chirurgicales de rajeunissement [1]. Ils ont pour but d'éliminer les rides et les plis cutanés et de remodeler les contours faciaux.…”
unclassified